Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Custom ebuilds for CoreOS

2014-12-10 Thread Tom H
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:17 AM, James wrote: > > And finally, I think that alll init systems are going to become very > irrelevant in the next few years, as what they provide, can be passed > from a *personal cluster* to any and all hardware, dymanically. That's > what the cell phones (smart phon

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Custom ebuilds for CoreOS

2014-12-03 Thread Saifi Khan
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Rich Freeman wrote: On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Mark David Dumlao wrote: but why? its its own frigging distro now. not gentoo by a long shot. I think it is actually a compliment to the flexibility of Gentoo that these derivatives are so different. Gentoo is a som

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Custom ebuilds for CoreOS

2014-12-03 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Mark David Dumlao wrote: > > but why? its its own frigging distro now. not gentoo by a long shot. > I think it is actually a compliment to the flexibility of Gentoo that these derivatives are so different. Gentoo is a somewhat-generic linux distro overall - in its

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Custom ebuilds for CoreOS

2014-12-03 Thread Mark David Dumlao
Look up. the very first post contrastd coreos' systemd as opposed to openrc, bringing words like "evil"ution into the park. later on we hear that coreos is "stealing" gentoo's ideas and hope that it is CRUSHED. but why? its its own frigging distro now. not gentoo by a long shot. On Wednesday, Dec

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Custom ebuilds for CoreOS

2014-12-03 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Wednesday, December 03, 2014 02:39:53 AM Mark David Dumlao wrote: > Why do I get the feeling that this is another episode of the "i hate > LennartSoft(tm) too" circlejerk on the gentoo mailing list? Why do I get the feeling you just want another flamewar? I don't see any mention of systemd or a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Custom ebuilds for CoreOS

2014-12-02 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:37 PM, James wrote: > Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes: > >> You seem to be wanting a minimalist profile of Gentoo, not CoreOS. > > YES!, I want Gentoo to "CRUSH" CoreOS because we can and our goal is not > to deceptively move users to a "rent the binary" jail. OK? > Gen

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Custom ebuilds for CoreOS

2014-12-02 Thread Mark David Dumlao
Why do I get the feeling that this is another episode of the "i hate LennartSoft(tm) too" circlejerk on the gentoo mailing list? this mailing list used to be about gentoo. On Dec 3, 2014 1:38 AM, "James" wrote: > Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes: > > > > > > is integration of the best of the Cor

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Custom ebuilds for CoreOS

2014-12-02 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:35 AM, James wrote: > > I do not see the "/usr" types of systems (like a current gentoo workstation > or server) going away any time soon. What I hope WE can pull off at Gentoo > is integration of the best of the CoreOS ideas into "Gentoo proper". I'm not suggesting that