On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Daniel da Veiga
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 15:16, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>> On 2009-01-27, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 06:29:55 Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2009-01-26, Ala
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 15:16, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2009-01-27, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 27 January 2009 06:29:55 Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2009-01-26, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> These are shared documents. I can't just
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2009-01-27, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On Tuesday 27 January 2009 06:29:55 Grant Edwards wrote:
>>> On 2009-01-26, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> > These are shared documents. I can't just change what they are
>>> > based on my own preferences.
>
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 17:46:46 Grant Edwards wrote:
> I realize I'm arguing a moot point, but using something like
> .docx for shared documents that need to be maintained by
> multiple people for a long time (more than a month or two) is a
> dead awful choice.
>
> A plain ascii text file is pr
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 06:29:55 Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2009-01-26, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > These are shared documents. I can't just change what they are
> > based on my own preferences.
> >
> > I need an app that WRITES .docx. If Office 2007 is the only
> > one that does it, so be it. But
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 00:16:04 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > I have a stock standard openoffice-3.0.0 here (not bin) and it claims to
> > write Office 2003 XML. I believe from colleagues that this is not the
> > same as 2007 .docx and I believe them as my Office 2003 in C
6 matches
Mail list logo
