* Harry Putnam [110430 00:03]:
> Todd Goodman writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > You won't really break anything by changing the log levels.
>
> Todd, your post was really a boost for me. And thanks for you kind
> offer of looking things over.
>
> [...]
>
> Mick wrote:
> > No worries! I'm no iptables
On 28 April 2011 06:31, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Mick writes:
>> Once you access it via telnet, have a look for any log rules in IP Tables
>> (/sbin/iptables -L -v -n) and perhaps all we need to do is modify those.
>
> Yeah I had a look at the lines containing LOG and of course had no
> idea of wha
* Harry Putnam [110428 01:06]:
> Yeah I had a look at the lines containing LOG and of course had no
> idea of what they meant or how to alter them.
>
> The entire iptables is inlined below... maybe you will know how to alter
> them so that ports show up in logs. That is, only if you are still
>
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 23:27:06 Harry Putnam wrote:
> Mick writes:
> >> After turning remote admin on, and setting a single IP address to be
> >> able to connect... I still cannot access it for remote admin on 8080.
> >
> > Did you try this from the Internet, or from within your LAN?
>
> Insid
On Monday 25 April 2011 23:23:07 Jake Moe wrote:
> I haven't followed this entire thread, but is there any chance this
> isn't really a "Cisco" device as you know it, but a rebranded
> "Linksys"? After seeing a picture of the device, and reading that it's
> a "Small Business" router, I'd suspect i
I haven't followed this entire thread, but is there any chance this
isn't really a "Cisco" device as you know it, but a rebranded
"Linksys"? After seeing a picture of the device, and reading that it's
a "Small Business" router, I'd suspect it's a device that came out of
their acquisition of Linksy
On Monday 25 April 2011 19:20:55 Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> > Thanks for the site. After looking around there a while I'm not
> > seeing how to gain a terminal to execute any ios commands.
> >
> > Neither ssh or telnet are accepted at the router
On Monday 25 April 2011 18:37:31 Harry Putnam wrote:
> Mick writes:
> > On a typical Cisco router you should be able to download/edit/upload
> > the configuration file from/to the router using tftp and a text
> > editor, or minicom and a serial cable if the router has a serial
> > port,
>
> When
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Thanks for the site. After looking around there a while I'm not
> seeing how to gain a terminal to execute any ios commands.
>
> Neither ssh or telnet are accepted at the router.
This page shows how to enable the telnet service via a hidden
* Harry Putnam [110422 16:00]:
> Todd Goodman writes:
>
> > There is a basic firewall in place with OpenWRT (enabled by default.)
> >
> > There is a a web GUI for OpenWRT (as well as with DD-WRT.)
> >
> > The web GUI supports the usual config pages as with other similar home
> > routers.
> >
> >
On 22 April 2011 20:28, Harry Putnam wrote:
> On the cisco RVS4000 v2.. I see no way to enter the syntax shown at
> the URL or in your previous post.
The syntax is meant to be used in the cisco configuration file itself.
Using IOS commands you should be able to set up the same ACLs from a
termi
* Harry Putnam [110420 15:03]:
> Paul Hartman writes:
>
> > Apr 20 14:41:08 ddwrt kern.warn kernel: [2814955.71] DROP IN=eth1
> > OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:1b:54:c9:4b:d9:08:00 SRC=10.166.128.1
> > DST=255.255.255.255 LEN=325 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=255 ID=34279
> > PROTO=UDP SPT=67 DPT=6
On Thursday 21 April 2011 06:55:41 Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 April 2011 16:56:15 Harry Putnam wrote:
> > Mick writes:
> > > Do you get the same condensed format when you capture the logs in your
> > > LAN syslog server?
> >
> > I did not try that, but is there some reason to expect a differen
On Wednesday 20 April 2011 16:56:15 Harry Putnam wrote:
> Mick writes:
> > Do you get the same condensed format when you capture the logs in your
> > LAN syslog server?
>
> I did not try that, but is there some reason to expect a difference?
No, it shouldn't - after all it is the same log file
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 06:35, Dale wrote:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>>
>> Dale writes:
>>
>> Your previous post showed this as total.
>>
>> *All prices are in British Pounds* *Subtotal* 244.00
>> *Delivery* 0.00
>> --
Harry Putnam wrote:
Dale writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
Dale writes:
[...]
I guess one could use Froogle if you can't buy it across the pond.
Cheap little thing tho. o_O
What is the cpu?
Intel Atom 1.6GHz CPU
I couldn't tell if you were jok
On Wednesday 20 April 2011 20:50:51 Dale wrote:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
> > What is the cpu?
>
> Intel Atom 1.6GHz CPU
N270.
> > I couldn't tell if you were joking about cheap... ... so is the final
> > price about $400 US?
>
> I don't really know. I would assume as I had it configured, that was
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> Whereas openWRT sounds like you may need to role your own iptables
> script right off the bat. at least judging from a few posts I've now
> read from their mailing list where people seem to be asking the kinds
> of iptables questions you mi
Harry Putnam wrote:
Dale writes:
[...]
I guess one could use Froogle if you can't buy it across the pond.
Cheap little thing tho. o_O
What is the cpu?
Intel Atom 1.6GHz CPU
I couldn't tell if you were joking about cheap... ... so is the final
price about $400 US?
Harry Putnam wrote:
Peter Humphrey writes:
On Tuesday 19 April 2011 04:31:38 Harry Putnam wrote:
I'm not interested in running an old linux or openbsd, machine as router.
Having a silent cool router the size and weight of a medium book is too
appealing.
I'm gazing at an At
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Maybe you can make some comment about logging capablities? Maybe one
> or both of you might be willing to post a log sample?
Ultimately it's just a linux box, you can run syslogd and log
kernel/firewall/etc to a local or remote syslog. Since
* Harry Putnam [110420 13:51]:
> Stroller writes:
>
> > Consider OpenWRT. You can run it on something like the Netgear
> > WNR2000, the Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH, or something even cheaper if you
> > don't need wifi.
>
> I don't need wifi, but of course OpenWRT won't run on the cisco
> But that WZR
22 matches
Mail list logo
