Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Choice of Photo gallery tools

2010-02-18 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 08:50 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: > I'll look into JAlbum > > One main requirement is that user/viewer be able to download full > resolution original photos. No commercial (shopping cart) type stuff > is required just a family operation. from memory I did 3 sizes - the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Choice of Photo gallery tools

2010-02-18 Thread Mick
On Thursday 18 February 2010 14:54:37 Harry Putnam wrote: > Mick writes: > > On Thursday 18 February 2010 01:35:12 Iain Buchanan wrote: > >> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:14 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: > >> > I wondered if anyone here can speak on the various photo and > >> > gallery generating tools av

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Choice of Photo gallery tools

2010-02-18 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:53:15 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: > > If you want to host it yourself, there's Gallery. It too has plenty of > > options and can take a little tweaking to get it just as you want. > > Neil, do you know off hand if gallery offers user/viewer the ability > to download origin

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Choice of Photo gallery tools

2010-02-18 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Thursday 18 February 2010 15:53:15 Harry Putnam wrote: > Neil Bothwick writes: > > On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:05:12 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: > >> never tried smugmug and don't know what your requirements are, but I > >> push JAlbum. You can create some pretty good looking albums and run > >> th