Re: [gentoo-user] Ooo-2-bin

2005-06-21 Thread Michael W. Holdeman
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 04:30 pm, Zac Medico wrote: > Michael W. Holdeman wrote: > > OK I had OOo 1.9.79m104 from some overlay, then portage updated to m108. > > > > With m104 I had nicer icons, and the base app, which I did use to build > > and access some bases, now with the 108 from portage I am

Re: [gentoo-user] Ooo-2-bin

2005-06-21 Thread Michael W. Holdeman
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 04:28 pm, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:15:32 -0400, Michael W. Holdeman wrote: > > With m104 I had nicer icons, and the base app, which I did use to build > > and access some bases, now with the 108 from portage I am back to the > > old icons and no base app

Re: [gentoo-user] Ooo-2-bin

2005-06-21 Thread Zac Medico
Michael W. Holdeman wrote: > OK I had OOo 1.9.79m104 from some overlay, then portage updated to m108. > > With m104 I had nicer icons, and the base app, which I did use to build and > access some bases, now with the 108 from portage I am back to the old icons > and no base app?? > Anyone else se

Re: [gentoo-user] Ooo-2-bin

2005-06-21 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:15:32 -0400, Michael W. Holdeman wrote: > With m104 I had nicer icons, and the base app, which I did use to build > and access some bases, now with the 108 from portage I am back to the > old icons and no base app?? I'm using app-office/openoffice-bin-1.9.109 from portage a