On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 23:42, Martin Ullrich wrote:
> I've now compiled 3 new binary packages for you:
>
> http://members.chello.at/martin-ullrich/coreutils-5.2.1-r7.tbz2
>
> http://members.chello.at/martin-ullrich/coreutils-5.93.tbz2
>
> Whichever you want to use.
> If they don't work, I've also comp
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 00:21, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Ahrrr! We were _so_ close...
>
> All it would have taken to get around this was 'rm /bin/install' and
> 'cp /var/tmp/portage/coreutils-5.93/work/coreutils-5.93/src/ginstall
> /bin/install' and then coreutils would have emerged fine.
>
> Have do
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 18:27, Rumen Yotov wrote:
> Yeah it's due to "acl" USE flag, which i have/use.
> $ emerge coreutils -pv
>
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies ...done!
> [ebuild R ] sys-apps/coreutils-5.93 USE="acl nls -build -static" 59
> kB
Bogo Mipps wrote:
> /bin/install -c 'cp'
> '/usr/tmp/portage/coreutils-5.2.1-r7/image//bin/cp' install:
> unable to open
> `/usr/tmp/portage/coreutils-5.2.1-r7/image//bin/cp/cp': No such
> file or directory
Ahrrr! We were _so_ close...
All it would have taken to get around this was 'rm /bin/in
Hi again!
I've now compiled 3 new binary packages for you:
http://members.chello.at/martin-ullrich/coreutils-5.2.1-r7.tbz2
http://members.chello.at/martin-ullrich/coreutils-5.93.tbz2
Whichever you want to use.
If they don't work, I've also compiled a statically linked package:
http://members.c
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 15:53 +1300, Bogo Mipps wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:47, Rumen Yotov wrote:
> > I have one (CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer")
> > Normal except ~x86 (all testing) system - coreutils-5.93: 2.1M.
> > Putting the binary here: ftp://ftp.qrypto.org (my ro
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:54, Martin Ullrich wrote:
> I compiled coreutils 5.2.1-r7 with your CFLAGS and only the NLS
> USE-flag. Assuming you have gcc-3.4 installed it should work.
>
> http://members.chello.at/martin-ullrich/coreutils-5.2.1-r7.tbz2
>
> Just boot from a live-cd (e.g. the gentoo instal
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:02, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> This is a bug in busybox 1.00, it's fixed in busybox-1.1.0.
>
> On my primary partition I've emerged the newer version, copied it to
> the other partition, and did the 'ebuild install' again: it worked
> flawlessly. ... This won't help you now
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:47, Rumen Yotov wrote:
> I have one (CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer")
> Normal except ~x86 (all testing) system - coreutils-5.93: 2.1M.
> Putting the binary here: ftp://ftp.qrypto.org (my router).
> As emerge doesn't work (assume) put it in / (root di
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 01:02 +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> > here too it keeps failing at different places all the time.
>
> This is a bug in busybox 1.00, it's fixed in busybox-1.1.0.
>
> On my primary partition I've emerged the newer version, copied it to
> the ot
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> here too it keeps failing at different places all the time.
This is a bug in busybox 1.00, it's fixed in busybox-1.1.0.
On my primary partition I've emerged the newer version, copied it to
the other partition, and did the 'ebuild install' again: it worked
flawlessly.
Bogo Mipps wrote:
> /bin/install -c 'cp'
> '/usr/tmp/portage/coreutils-5.2.1-r7/image//bin/cp' install:
> unable to open
> /bin/install -c 'vdir'
> '/usr/tmp/portage/coreutils-5.2.1-r7/image//bin/vdir'
> install: unable to open
Hrrm... No idea why it's doing that... On a secondary gentoo
p
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 09:36, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Yes! :) What's the fun in taking binaries from others when you
> have busybox aboard, and it is there exactly for this purpose.
Agree!
So did it manually -
> And then emerge coreutils. Much more interesting.
- all seems to go well except
Bogo Mipps wrote:
> Yes, it's up-to-date and busybox is installed. Never had the
> occasion to use it, but this could be the time.
Yes! :) What's the fun in taking binaries from others when you
have busybox aboard, and it is there exactly for this purpose.
If you don't like trial and error, f
On Sunday 05 February 2006 11:35 am, Mike Williams wrote:
> On Sunday 05 February 2006 18:27, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > > Ehm. Which possibly creates a chicken-egg problem. How do you make the
> > > symlink from ln -> busybox without having /bin/ln in the first place ?
> >
> > There's no requirem
On Sunday 05 February 2006 18:27, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > Ehm. Which possibly creates a chicken-egg problem. How do you make the
> > symlink from ln -> busybox without having /bin/ln in the first place ?
>
> There's no requirement for ln being a symlink. Instead, you could
> also copy busybox t
Hi!
I compiled coreutils 5.2.1-r7 with your CFLAGS and only the NLS
USE-flag. Assuming you have gcc-3.4 installed it should work.
http://members.chello.at/martin-ullrich/coreutils-5.2.1-r7.tbz2
Just boot from a live-cd (e.g. the gentoo install-cd), and extract the
file with "tar -xjpf coreutils-
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 07:10 +1300, Bogo Mipps wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 01:30, Mike Williams wrote:
> > I think the only real option is to post your CFLAGS, and perhaps someone
> > will be nice enough to send you a statically compiled binary package of
> > coreutils.
>
> Thanks guys - will star
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 01:54, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Yours is a up-to-date system and you have busybox installed? Then
> type in that command and read carefully: "Most people will create
> a link to busybox for each function they wish to use, and BusyBox
> will act like whatever it was invoked a
Maarten wrote:
> Benno Schulenberg wrote:
>> Benno Schulenberg wrote:
>> /bin/ln
> ^^^
>
> Ehm. Which possibly creates a chicken-egg problem. How do you make the
> symlink from ln -> busybox without having /bin/ln in the first place ?
There's no requirement for ln being a symlink. Instea
Bogo Mipps wrote:
> Thanks guys - will start with this one, in the hope that someone
> out there will take pity.
No no, don't take pity. This is too good a chance to see busybox in
action. :) Please report back how you are getting along.
Start with these:
busybox ln -s busybox /bin/ln
ln -s
Maarten wrote:
> > Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> > /bin/ln
> ^^^
>
> Ehm. Which possibly creates a chicken-egg problem. How do you
> make the symlink from ln -> busybox without having /bin/ln in the
> first place ?
busybox ln -s busybox /bin/ln
Benno
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 01:30, Mike Williams wrote:
> I think the only real option is to post your CFLAGS, and perhaps someone
> will be nice enough to send you a statically compiled binary package of
> coreutils.
Thanks guys - will start with this one, in the hope that someone out there
will take pi
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:07:37 +0100 Maarten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> > /bin/link
> > /bin/ln
> ^^^
>
> Ehm. Which possibly creates a chicken-egg problem. How do you make
> the symlink from ln -> busybox without having /bin/ln in the first
> place ?
Boot from a
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Benno Schulenberg wrote:
>
>>here's the output of 'equery files coreutils':
>
>
> Hmm... equery behaves different when its output is redirected.
> Here's a list without any of the duplicates (symlinks) in /usr/bin.
>
> /bin/link
> /bin/ln
^^^
Ehm. Which poss
On Sunday 05 February 2006 12:13, Bogo Mipps wrote:
> Hi
>
> Have stuffed up and accidentally un-merged my coreutils: now can't emerge
> either what was current (5.2.1-r7) or newer version (5.3.0-r1) and needless
> to say have lost all coreutils tools which doesn't help. Google makes it
> look like
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> here's the output of 'equery files coreutils':
Hmm... equery behaves different when its output is redirected.
Here's a list without any of the duplicates (symlinks) in /usr/bin.
/bin/basename
/bin/cat
/bin/chgrp
/bin/chmod
/bin/chown
/bin/chroot
/bin/cksum
/bin/comm
/
Bogo Mipps wrote:
> Have stuffed up and accidentally un-merged my coreutils: now
> can't emerge either what was current (5.2.1-r7) or newer version
> (5.3.0-r1) and needless to say have lost all coreutils tools
> which doesn't help.
Yours is a up-to-date system and you have busybox installed? The
On Sunday 05 February 2006 10:13, Bogo Mipps wrote:
> Have stuffed up and accidentally un-merged my coreutils: now can't emerge
> either what was current (5.2.1-r7) or newer version (5.3.0-r1) and needless
> to say have lost all coreutils tools which doesn't help. Google makes it
> look like no-one
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 23:13 +1300, Bogo Mipps wrote:
> Hi
>
> Have stuffed up and accidentally un-merged my coreutils: now can't emerge
> either what was current (5.2.1-r7) or newer version (5.3.0-r1) and needless
> to say have lost all coreutils tools which doesn't help. Google makes it look
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
