Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Dale wrote:
>
>> Paul Hartman wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Dale wrote:
>>>
>>>
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Dale wrote:
>
>
>
>
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Dale wrote:
> Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Dale wrote:
>>
>>> Paul Hartman wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Dale wrote:
> Well, that started something. I'll post the output here.
>
> kbuildsycoca r
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Dale wrote:
>
>> Paul Hartman wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Dale wrote:
>>>
>>>
Well, that started something. I'll post the output here.
kbuildsycoca running...
Reusing existing ksycoca
>>>
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Dale wrote:
> Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Dale wrote:
>>
>>> Well, that started something. I'll post the output here.
>>>
>>> kbuildsycoca running...
>>> Reusing existing ksycoca
>>> kio (KService*): WARNING: The desktop entry file
>>>
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Dale wrote:
>
>> Well, that started something. I'll post the output here.
>>
>> kbuildsycoca running...
>> Reusing existing ksycoca
>> kio (KService*): WARNING: The desktop entry file
>> .hidden/dirfilterplugin.desktop has Type=Service but
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Dale wrote:
> Well, that started something. I'll post the output here.
>
> kbuildsycoca running...
> Reusing existing ksycoca
> kio (KService*): WARNING: The desktop entry file
> .hidden/dirfilterplugin.desktop has Type=Service but is located under
> "apps" instea
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 15. Oktober 2009 schrieb Dale:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have KDE 4 installed as well and I think this is causing the problem
>> but hope there is a fix for this little boo boo. I have links to
>> locations on my desktop so that I can click on them to get to pl
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 15. Oktober 2009 schrieb Dale:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have KDE 4 installed as well and I think this is causing the problem
>> but hope there is a fix for this little boo boo. I have links to
>> locations on my desktop so that I can click on them to get to pl
Am Donnerstag, 15. Oktober 2009 schrieb Dale:
> Hi,
>
> I have KDE 4 installed as well and I think this is causing the problem
> but hope there is a fix for this little boo boo. I have links to
> locations on my desktop so that I can click on them to get to places
> directly. I have one for camer
Thanks again - going into kde-meta, it seems that everything will be ok
Francisco
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Monday 15 June 2009 03:32:57 Francisco Ares wrote:
>> I've found out that there are some packages out of kde-basse that are
>> pulling 3.5.10 packages while
On Monday 15 June 2009 03:32:57 Francisco Ares wrote:
> I've found out that there are some packages out of kde-basse that are
> pulling 3.5.10 packages while they're still masked ~x86
>
> One is Amarok. Another, probably, is Ktorrent.
Amarok-1.4 will pull in kdelibs-3.5.10
Amarok-2.1 will pull in
I've found out that there are some packages out of kde-basse that are
pulling 3.5.10 packages while they're still masked ~x86
One is Amarok. Another, probably, is Ktorrent.
Anyone has seen it or am I the only one not using KDE 4 ;-) ?
Best regards to all
Francisco
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 5:58
On Saturday 13 June 2009 01:54:45 Francisco Ares wrote:
> Thanks a lot!
It's not completely obvious from Dirk's post (what he said is completely
accurate though), but kde-3.5.10 will not receive monolithic ebuilds (dev
decision). If you want kde-3.5.10, there is only one way to do it -
Unmerge
Thanks a lot!
Francisco
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Freitag 12 Juni 2009 22:45:49 schrieb Francisco Ares:
>
> > And how do I tell if an ebuild is monolithic or not?
>
> The monolithic ones install larger parts of KDE, and usually have the same
> names as the origi
Am Freitag 12 Juni 2009 22:45:49 schrieb Francisco Ares:
> And how do I tell if an ebuild is monolithic or not?
The monolithic ones install larger parts of KDE, and usually have the same
names as the original source packages offered at KDE.org.
The split ebuilds, well, split those packages into
And how do I tell if an ebuild is monolithic or not?
Thanks
Francisco
--
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples then you
and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have one
idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas."
Am Freitag 12 Juni 2009 22:24:26 schrieb Francisco Ares:
> It looks like there's some issue in some packages being 3.5.10 and all the
> rest being 3.5.9, but I have no keywords set in
> /etc/portage/packages.keywords - perhaps I should.
Partly. It seems to be a mix of split ebuilds and monolithic
Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 12. Mai 2009 11:25:07 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
>
>> Furthermore, how to unmerge all of KDE:3.5, e.g.
>> emerge --unmerge kde-base/kde-meta:3.5
>> does not work.
>
> paludis --uninstall --with-dependencies =kdelibs-3.5.9
>
If you have openoffice installed, it
Am Dienstag, 12. Mai 2009 11:25:07 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
> Furthermore, how to unmerge all of KDE:3.5, e.g.
> emerge --unmerge kde-base/kde-meta:3.5
> does not work.
paludis --uninstall --with-dependencies =kdelibs-3.5.9
HTH...
Dirk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally si
On Tue, May 12, 2009 11:25, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'd like to phase out KDE:3.5. One reason is, that I cannot install
> both, 3.5 and 4.2 without using 'prefix'.
>
> For doing so, I need to find out which (installed) packages use which
> parts of KDE:3.5. Is there something better tha
On 5/12/09, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to phase out KDE:3.5. One reason is, that I cannot install
> both, 3.5 and 4.2 without using 'prefix'.
>
> For doing so, I need to find out which (installed) packages use which
> parts of KDE:3.5. Is there something better than unmerge all of K
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to phase out KDE:3.5. One reason is, that I cannot install
> both, 3.5 and 4.2 without using 'prefix'.
>
> For doing so, I need to find out which (installed) packages use which
> parts of KDE:3.5. Is there something better than unmerge all of KDE:3.5
> and
On Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> kde:3.5 poses me a Gordian knot which I cannot cut.
>
> Besides the whole kde:4.2 packages I still have kde:3.5 packages.
>
> Trying to re-emerge e.g. kde-base/kdepim:3.5 I get blocking packages.
> Many packages are built with kde-base/kdeli
On Monday 29 May 2006 22:52, Daniel wrote:
> On Saturday 27 May 2006 13:37, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > kmail crashes me a lot because of this:
> > it tries to fetch mails from a defunc server (it is still in the
> > prefs, because it will be back in some weeks - and I don't know the
> > pw an
On Saturday 27 May 2006 13:37, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> kmail crashes me a lot because of this:
> it tries to fetch mails from a defunc server (it is still in the
> prefs, because it will be back in some weeks - and I don't know the
> pw anymore). When I close kmail, while it waits for the ti
On Saturday 27 May 2006 17:01, fire-eyes wrote:
> On Saturday 27 May 2006 10:41, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > > True. But why keep 3.4?
> >
> > because 3.5 has some bugs - and some people have less problems tolerate
> > this bugs than others.
>
> I must agree here. I have been using the 3.5 eb
On Saturday 27 May 2006 10:41, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > True. But why keep 3.4?
>
> because 3.5 has some bugs - and some people have less problems tolerate
> this bugs than others.
I must agree here. I have been using the 3.5 ebuilds since they entered the
tree many months) on two system
On Saturday 27 May 2006 08:03, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 May 2006 06:04, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> >>I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
> >>it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first. No problem
On Fri, 26 May 2006 23:04:12 -0500, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade
> to it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first.
The whole point of slotting is that you *don't* have to unmerge 3.4
first. You can continue to use
Richard Fish wrote:
On 5/26/06, Anthony E. Caudel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first.
You don't need to unmerge 3.4 _first_. You can do it after you have
merged 3.5, a
On 5/26/06, Anthony E. Caudel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first.
You don't need to unmerge 3.4 _first_. You can do it after you have
merged 3.5, although even then it is
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Saturday 27 May 2006 06:04, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first. No problem,
but I think I will then have to recompile all non-kde but relate
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Saturday 27 May 2006 06:04, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> > I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
> > it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first. No problem,
> > but I think I will then have t
On Saturday 27 May 2006 06:04, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
> it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first. No problem,
> but I think I will then have to recompile all non-kde but related apps,
> such a k3b, that
Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first. No problem,
but I think I will then have to recompile all non-kde but related apps,
such a k3b, that were compiled against the old libra
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:51:48 -0700, Ian wrote:
> I installed KDE 3.5 with the split ebuilds, emerging the minimum:
> konqueror, kdesktop, kcontrol, konsole, kicker, etc...
> I noticed that I dont get that dialog box that appears when KDE finds a
> new medium for data. (CD, Jumpdrive)
> Do you know
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Ah, yes, I remember that now, sorry for doubting you. Funny, I used it at
one time, but I don't need it now. Instead I use the attached shell
script after ripping, that you may modify for your purposes.
Thanks for the script, I'll give it a
try, I had just s
On Saturday 11 February 2006 02:48, Stewart Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5
and KAudiocreator':
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > Are you sure you are talking about KAudioCreator; that just rips and
> > encodes cdda CDs? If yo
Hi
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Are you sure you are talking about KAudioCreator; that just rips and
encodes cdda CDs? If you are please tell me where this play list option
is/was in the menus and dialogs.
Yes, KAudioCreator. The play list option
was (V. 1.12 ) in Settings > Configure
KA
On Saturday 04 February 2006 08:16, Stewart Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about '[gentoo-user] KDE 3.5 and
KAudiocreator':
> Does anyone else have problems with the
> play list option in KAudioCreator 1.13
> as comes with KDE 3.5.
Are you sure you are talking about KAudioCreator; that just r
060102 Philip Webb wrote:
> On Monday 02 January 2006 00:02, Philip Webb wrote:
>> I started to install KDE 3.5 (split) -- still ~x86
And a final word: I've finished installing the many parts of KDE 3.5
-- the ones I want : it took 3 h 57 m -- & it seems to be working well
after a couple of bits
060102 Philip Webb wrote:
> On Monday 02 January 2006 00:02, Philip Webb wrote:
>> I started to install KDE 3.5 (split) -- still ~x86 -- & got Kdelibs done,
>> then went on to Kdebase-startkde, which pulls in 17 dependencies.
>> Some of them went thro' ok, but then Kicker refused as below; I trie
060101 Philip Webb wrote:
> On Monday 02 January 2006 00:02, Philip Webb wrote:
>> I started to install KDE 3.5 (split) -- still ~x86 -- & got Kdelibs done,
>> then went on to Kdebase-startkde, which pulls in 17 dependencies.
>> Some of them went thro' ok, but then Kicker refused as below; I trie
060102 Abhay Kedia wrote:
> Can you give output of "emerge -pv kdelibs && emerge -pv kdebase-startkde" ?
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild R ] kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.0-r1 +acl -alsa -arts +cups -debug -doc
-jpeg2k -kdeenablefinal -
On Monday 02 January 2006 00:31, Philip Webb wrote:
>
> No, but I just tried it with Khelpcenter & it made no difference.
> The problem seems to be in Kdelibs, as my most recent message outlined.
>
Can you give output of "emerge -pv kdelibs && emerge -pv kdebase-startkde" ?
Regards,
Abhay
pgpyn3
060102 Abhay Kedia wrote:
> On Sunday 01 January 2006 20:32, Philip Webb wrote:
>> I started to install KDE 3.5 (split) -- still ~x86 -- & got Kdelibs done,
>> then went on to Kdebase-startkde
> [snip]
>> unable to parse ./index.docbook
> Just a shot in the dark.
> Did you enable kdeenablefinal u
On Sunday 01 January 2006 20:32, Philip Webb wrote:
>
> I started to install KDE 3.5 (split) -- still ~x86 -- & got Kdelibs done,
> then went on to Kdebase-startkde
[snip]
> ...
> unable to parse ./index.docbook
>
Just a shot in the dark. Did you enable kdeenablefinal use flag AFTER you
compil
060101 Philip Webb wrote:
> On Monday 02 January 2006 00:02, Philip Webb wrote:
>> I started to install KDE 3.5 (split) -- still ~x86 -- & got Kdelibs done,
>> then went on to Kdebase-startkde, which pulls in 17 dependencies.
>> Some of them went thro' ok, but then Kicker refused as below; I trie
060102 Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Monday 02 January 2006 00:02, Philip Webb wrote:
>> I started to install KDE 3.5 (split) -- still ~x86 -- & got Kdelibs done,
>> then went on to Kdebase-startkde, which pulls in 17 dependencies.
>> Some of them went thro' ok, but then Kicker refused as below; I tri
On Monday 02 January 2006 00:02, Philip Webb wrote:
> Before I submit a bug report, has anyone had a similar experience ?
> Does anyone have anything to suggest to try first ?
>
> I started to install KDE 3.5 (split) -- still ~x86 -- & got Kdelibs done,
> then went on to Kdebase-startkde, which pul
On Jan 1, 2006, at 9:02 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
Before I submit a bug report, has anyone had a similar experience ?
Does anyone have anything to suggest to try first ?
I did an emerge kdebase-startkde and didn't see any errors, but the
kicker doesn't seem to exist...so maybe it failed and I j
Daniel Heemann wrote:
Add the user to the plugdev group.
That worked!
Thank you,
Roy
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Monday 19 December 2005 20:12, Roy Wright wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Just upgraded KDE to 3.5 and have a minor problem.
> When I start KDE with a SM memory card installed
> in my USB reader, a removable media icon shows on
> the desktop. If I remove the memory card, the icon
> goes away. If I reinser
Kde-3.5 runs perfect- best kde yet. Just unmask it
in /etc/portage/package.keywords, like this:
=kde-base/arts-1.5.0 ~x86
=kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.0 ~x86
=kde-base/kdebase-3.5.0 ~x86
=kde-base/kdenetwork-3.5.0 ~x86
=kde-base/kdepim-3.5.0 ~x86
=kde-base/kdemultimedia-3.5.0 ~x86
=kde-base/kdeutils-3.
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 08:11:08 -0600, Dale wrote:
> >It is already in portage, you only have to unmask it to install. It
> >will probably be a while before the builds are marked stable, the
> >normal delay is 30 days.
> Crap, I'm going to bed then. I can't stay up that long. Just be a late
> Chri
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 07:12:04 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>
>
>>Anybody know when they will release it in portage? This weekend maybe?
>>
>>
>
>It is already in portage, you only have to unmask it to install. It will
>probably be a while before the builds are marked stable, th
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 07:12:04 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Anybody know when they will release it in portage? This weekend maybe?
It is already in portage, you only have to unmask it to install. It will
probably be a while before the builds are marked stable, the normal delay
is 30 days.
--
Neil Bothw
On Friday 02 December 2005 08:12 am, Dale wrote:
> Nagatoro wrote:
> > As far as I know KDE 3.5 is considered stable but the ebuilds that
> > install it in gentoo are not hence the ~arch keyword.
>
> Well, I'm not one to complain, they know best, but I do wish they
> would add it so we can emerge i
I'm using it for 8 hours now. No problems so far. :)
Cheers
Uwe
Thiago Lüttig wrote:
Hi, someone has installed the kde 3.5 how it´s running ??
--
__
Atenciosamente,
Thiago Lüttig
__
begin:vcard
fn:Uwe Klosa
n:Klosa;Uwe
org:Uppsala
Nagatoro wrote:
>
> As far as I know KDE 3.5 is considered stable but the ebuilds that
> install it in gentoo are not hence the ~arch keyword.
>
>
Well, I'm not one to complain, they know best, but I do wish they would
add it so we can emerge it. I've been waiting for this update.
I say that and
Dale wrote:
Christian Panten wrote:
[...]
3.4 -> 3.5. But threre were no updates for it. My question, is kde 3.5
[...]
It is available but it is still masked. I have heard of people
elsewhere that have it installed and it runs fine but the Gentoo folks
want to make sure before they mark it a
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>
>Sorry, my reply was a bit confusing. I was referring to the
>DISPLAYMANAGER setting and assumed you were, since you use kdm. If you
>set the use of gdm or kdm in DISPLAYMANAGER then XSESSION is ignored, so
>each user chooses their window manager when they log in. XSESSION
Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
>Am Freitag, 2. Dezember 2005 10:17 schrieb ext Dale:
>
>
>
>>Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>>rc.conf doesn't set the GUI you use, it only sets which display manager
>>>is run. The display manager is then used to choose the window manager.
>>>
>>>
>>Then wha
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:17:18 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> >>I use kdm and can select what version of KDE I want to login to. I
> >>also used that to select between KDE, Gnome, IceWM etc when I was
> >>testing the waters. Just thought you would like to know that. Kept
> >>me fr
Am Freitag, 2. Dezember 2005 10:17 schrieb ext Dale:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >rc.conf doesn't set the GUI you use, it only sets which display manager
> >is run. The display manager is then used to choose the window manager.
>
> Then what does this mean?
Neil was partly wrong here: _If_ you use
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>I use kdm and can select what version of KDE I want to login to. I also
>>used that to select between KDE, Gnome, IceWM etc when I was testing the
>>waters. Just thought you would like to know that. Kept me from having
>>to edit rc.conf to pick what GUI I wanted to use.
>
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:31:31 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Just to make sure I get this right, when I upgrade to KDE 3.5, KDE 3.4
> will still be installed right? This is how it was done in the past but
> I don't want to loose 3.4 until I get used to 3.5 and make sure it will
> work OK.
Yes, KDE is still
Christian Panten wrote:
>
>Hi @ll,
>
>I am using a x86 system.
>Today I did an "emerge sync && emerge -uDNpv world" and hoped for updating kde
>
>3.4 -> 3.5. But threre were no updates for it. My question, is kde 3.5
>already not stable?
>
>Or have I to do something I forgot?
>
>
>Best regards
Am Donnerstag, 1. Dezember 2005 12:12 schrieb Thiago Lüttig:
> Hi, someone has installed the kde 3.5 how it´s running ??
>
> --
> __
>
> Atenciosamente,
> Thiago Lüttig
>
> __
Hi @ll,
I am using a x86 system.
Today I did an "emerge sync
Robert Crawford wrote:
>Correct. Just to be sure, do emerge -up kde first, and if NS (new slot) is
>before each kde package, you're ready to go. Also it's a good idea to do a :
>
>cp -a /home/user/.kde3.4 .kde.old
>
>for a backup of your user configs. Maybe also back up a few config files
>in /
Correct. Just to be sure, do emerge -up kde first, and if NS (new slot) is
before each kde package, you're ready to go. Also it's a good idea to do a :
cp -a /home/user/.kde3.4 .kde.old
for a backup of your user configs. Maybe also back up a few config files
in /usr/kde/3.4/share/config. Real
Hi,
Just to make sure I get this right, when I upgrade to KDE 3.5, KDE 3.4
will still be installed right? This is how it was done in the past but
I don't want to loose 3.4 until I get used to 3.5 and make sure it will
work OK.
I use kdm and can select what version of KDE I want to login to. I a
Hi !!
I'm just finishing emerging lots of updates and KDE of course. I'll tell
you. I've seen that KDE 3.5 is slotted, and I'd like to uninstall 3.4
version, but I've got installed non-monolithic package, so there are lots
of dependencies and apps that are not on kde-base, and I'd like to know
how
Kumar Golap wrote:
>
> Would not the command revdep-rebuild do this for you ?
> Just need to clarify before jumping in to kde-3.5 too.
>
Yes, after removing 3.4. Until you remove it I don't think
revdep-rebuild complains because the needed libraries are still there.
Regards,
Petteri
signatur
Kumar Golap wrote:
Also, after unmerging KDE 3.4, I had to rebuild all the other apps
that were built for 3.4 viz. konversation, amarok, kdiff3, krename,
kio-locate, krusader, kmldonkey, ktorrent, tellico, kchmviewer etc etc
etc.
Would not the command revdep-rebuild do thi
Michael Kintzios wrote:
If you have an old monolithic KDE install (in my case KDE-3.2.x) and
would like to unmerge it along with all the kde 3.2.x packages and
exclusive dependencies to save some space, how would you do it? How
could one ensure that there will be no apps/deps out there, which w
Also, after unmerging KDE 3.4, I had to rebuild all the other appsthat were built for
3.4 viz. konversation, amarok, kdiff3, krename,kio-locate, krusader, kmldonkey, ktorrent, tellico, kchmviewer etc etcetc.
Would not the command revdep-rebuild do this for you ?
Just need to clarify before jump
On 01/12/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:41:52 +0530, Mrugesh Karnik wrote:
>
> > I just did emerge --udpate --deep world. It slotted 3.4 and 3.5, so I
> > first cleared out my distfiles to free up some space! Then, edited
> > /etc/rc.conf to set XSESSION="kde-
On Thursday 01 December 2005 13:12, Thiago Lüttig wrote:
> Hi, someone has installed the kde 3.5 how it“s running ??
>
upgraded (~amd64) app by app, then it apeared slotet, spent some time
unmerging all kde 3.4* parts
runing it for 10 hours, no problems noticed. dont know is there better
pe
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>You won't bork anything by unmasking only. then use emerge -f to fetch
>the files. Or download them from your nearest KDE mirror and put them
>in $DISTDIR.
>
>
>
>
I would bork something. ;) Trust me. It would likely not even boot
anymore. LOL
Dale
:-)
--
To err is h
> -Original Message-
> From: Mrugesh Karnik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 01 December 2005 13:12
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5
>
>
> Thiago Lüttig wrote:
> > how do you installed it ? i mean, the emerge pa
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:41:52 +0530, Mrugesh Karnik wrote:
> I just did emerge --udpate --deep world. It slotted 3.4 and 3.5, so I
> first cleared out my distfiles to free up some space! Then, edited
> /etc/rc.conf to set XSESSION="kde-3.5".
Use XSESSION="kde" and it will always use the latest v
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 06:24:33 -0600, Dale wrote:
> You wouldn't happen to recall how many MBs the downloads for KDE were
> would you?
147MB here.
> I know there are a lot of packages but it usually takes me a
> couple nights to get it all, like OOo does. Sorry dial-up!! I don't
> want to try to
Thiago Lüttig wrote:
how do you installed it ? i mean, the emerge parameters ?? :D
I just did emerge --udpate --deep world. It slotted 3.4 and 3.5, so I
first cleared out my distfiles to free up some space! Then, edited
/etc/rc.conf to set XSESSION="kde-3.5". After restarting
/etc/init.d/xdm
I'm sorry, but I can't recall it. I did not log this information. :(
/Uwe
Dale wrote:
Uwe Klosa wrote:
I'm compiling 3.5. There 102 update for my system. So itäll take a
while. I will write more as soon i can start it.
Cheers
Uwe
You wouldn't happen to recall how many MBs the downloads f
On Thursday 01 December 2005 12:12, Thiago Lüttig wrote:
> Hi, someone has installed the kde 3.5 how it´s running ??
yes I have.
It runs perfectly.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Uwe Klosa wrote:
> I'm compiling 3.5. There 102 update for my system. So itäll take a
> while. I will write more as soon i can start it.
>
> Cheers
> Uwe
>
You wouldn't happen to recall how many MBs the downloads for KDE were
would you? I know there are a lot of packages but it usually takes me a
Thiago Lüttig wrote:
> Hi, someone has installed the kde 3.5 how it´s running ??
I have tried to install kde-meta-3.5.0, however I get problems while
merging kdetalk-3.5.0 . I am not sure yet if I am alone on this one.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114078
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 05:45:33 -0600, Dale wrote:
> According to the forums, some have installed it already. It appears to
> be doing OK, considering it is not official yet. ;) I'm stuck
> downloading Open Office so I'm waiting before I at least download it.
It was released two days ago accordin
I'm compiling 3.5. There 102 update for my system. So itäll take a while. I
will write more as soon i can start it.
Cheers
Uwe
Thiago Lüttig wrote:
Hi, someone has installed the kde 3.5 how it´s running ??
--
__
Atenciosamente,
Thiago Lüttig
how do you installed it ? i mean, the emerge parameters ?? :D
On 12/1/05, Mrugesh Karnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thiago Lüttig wrote:> Hi, someone has installed the kde 3.5 how it´s running ??>> --
> __>> Atenciosamente,> Thiago Lüttig>> _
Thiago Lüttig wrote:
Hi, someone has installed the kde 3.5 how it´s running ??
--
__
Atenciosamente,
Thiago Lüttig
__
I should have it running in a couple of hours. I'll let you know then.
Regards,
Mrugesh
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.or
Thiago Lüttig wrote:
> Hi, someone has installed the kde 3.5 how it´s running ??
>
According to the forums, some have installed it already. It appears to
be doing OK, considering it is not official yet. ;) I'm stuck
downloading Open Office so I'm waiting before I at least download it.
Dal
93 matches
Mail list logo
