On Jan 8, 2008 12:53 AM, Renat Golubchyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:51:02 -0500 "Mark Shields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I'd also recommending after checking for the above, also check what
> > level of UDMA is set. Try this: hdparm -I /dev/hda | grep -i dma
> >
> >
I have a Western Digital 250GB SATA-II drive on an NForce4 integrated
SATA-II controller, here are my readings...
hdparm -I /dev/sda | grep -i dma
DMA: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 *udma6
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 1646 MB in 2.00 seconds = 823.19 MB/sec
Wayn0 wrote:
> William Kenworthy wrote:
>> If you have sata drives, and they are showing up as hdx, you have
>> something seriously misconfigured. They should be showing as sdx.
>>
>> Deselect everything in ATA/ATAPI/MFM/RLL and select the relevant boxes
>> in serial ATA. Dont forget fstab will n
BTW, which speed can be treated as "not slow"? hdparm for my SATA SAMSUNG
HD401LJ shows ~60MB/Sec. Is it normal?
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
William Kenworthy wrote:
If you have sata drives, and they are showing up as hdx, you have
something seriously misconfigured. They should be showing as sdx.
Deselect everything in ATA/ATAPI/MFM/RLL and select the relevant boxes
in serial ATA. Dont forget fstab will need redoing to match.
I al
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Wayn0 wrote:
> William Kenworthy wrote:
> > If you have sata drives, and they are showing up as hdx, you have
> > something seriously misconfigured. They should be showing as sdx.
> >
> > Deselect everything in ATA/ATAPI/MFM/RLL and select the relevant boxes
> > in seri
William Kenworthy wrote:
If you have sata drives, and they are showing up as hdx, you have
something seriously misconfigured. They should be showing as sdx.
Deselect everything in ATA/ATAPI/MFM/RLL and select the relevant boxes
in serial ATA. Dont forget fstab will need redoing to match.
I al
If you have sata drives, and they are showing up as hdx, you have
something seriously misconfigured. They should be showing as sdx.
Deselect everything in ATA/ATAPI/MFM/RLL and select the relevant boxes
in serial ATA. Dont forget fstab will need redoing to match.
I always thought that if you se
Renat Golubchyk wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:51:02 -0500 "Mark Shields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'd also recommending after checking for the above, also check what
level of UDMA is set. Try this: hdparm -I /dev/hda | grep -i dma
Yours should say probably either udma3 or udma4.
Why not ud
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:51:02 -0500 "Mark Shields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'd also recommending after checking for the above, also check what
> level of UDMA is set. Try this: hdparm -I /dev/hda | grep -i dma
>
> Yours should say probably either udma3 or udma4.
Why not udma5 ? All my PATA d
On Jan 7, 2008 8:37 PM, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Kenworthy wrote:
> > Check the options for your chipset in the kernel - look at device
> > drivers and ata/... devices. Looks like its just defaulted to the
> > minimum as it hasnt seen what chipset you are using.
> >
> > Also cons
William Kenworthy wrote:
> Check the options for your chipset in the kernel - look at device
> drivers and ata/... devices. Looks like its just defaulted to the
> minimum as it hasnt seen what chipset you are using.
>
> Also consider moving to libata - seems better where I have tried it.
>
> BillK
Check the options for your chipset in the kernel - look at device
drivers and ata/... devices. Looks like its just defaulted to the
minimum as it hasnt seen what chipset you are using.
Also consider moving to libata - seems better where I have tried it.
BillK
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 02:26 +0200,
13 matches
Mail list logo
