I can compromise by giving people a choice between...
a) Run the safe setting "-j1"
b) Run a with a higher value. If a compile blows up on you, try it
again with "-j1" before reporting a bug or asking for help.
First this mistakenly makes it seem that emerge failures are due to whatever
t
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 10:25:40AM -0400, Michael Crute wrote
> It may be simpler to look at
> http://www.freehackers.org/gentoo/gccflags/flag_gcc3.html for the cflags for
> the processor.
Yikes!!! Let's just say that I strongly disagree with them.
1) I do not consider -O3 to be "safe".
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 10:00:17AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 00:43:01 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
>
> > 1) In /etc/make.conf set the following entry...
> > MAKEOPTS="-j1"
> > Do *NOT*, I repeat, do *NOT* use higher numbers. You are begging
> > for problems if you do so
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 01:06:54AM -0400, Dave Nebinger wrote
> I don't necessarily agree with using "-*" in your USE flags, simply
> because I think the USE flags in the /etc/make.conf are meant to
> enhance the builds with options you plan on using. Default USE
> flags, as identified by the dev
On 9/11/05, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:25:40 -0400 Michael Crute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:| It may be simpler to look at|
http://www.freehackers.org/gentoo/gccflags/flag_gcc3.html for theExcept that it's oh so very wrong...Is it? How so? Just curious because
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:25:40 -0400 Michael Crute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| It may be simpler to look at
| http://www.freehackers.org/gentoo/gccflags/flag_gcc3.html for the
Except that it's oh so very wrong...
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail
On 9/11/05, Walter Dnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2) The generic portion of CFLAGS consists of those flags that do notbegin with "-m". For that part, use "-O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" Please, do *NOT* use "-O3" (or higher!!!) or try to unroll every last
loop or use every last exotic generi
On 9/11/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 00:43:01 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
>
> > 1) In /etc/make.conf set the following entry...
> > MAKEOPTS="-j1"
> > Do *NOT*, I repeat, do *NOT* use higher numbers. You are begging
> > for problems if you do so.
>
> Th
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 00:43:01 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> 1) In /etc/make.conf set the following entry...
> MAKEOPTS="-j1"
> Do *NOT*, I repeat, do *NOT* use higher numbers. You are begging
> for problems if you do so.
This is a blanket statement that will only slow down compiles for a lot
Not to rain on your parade, Walter, but:
1) In /etc/make.conf set the following entry...
MAKEOPTS="-j1"
Do *NOT*, I repeat, do *NOT* use higher numbers. You are begging
for problems if you do so.
I use distcc in my compile farm and have most systems set to -j8 or above.
I haven't run in
10 matches
Mail list logo
