Re: [gentoo-user] Compression tools Compared

2005-08-17 Thread Jerry McBride
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 10:55 am, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Friday 12 August 2005 23:58, Jerry McBride wrote: > > What you're seeing are the results of compressing /lib on my gentoo > > powered laptop. > > For comparison purposes, what compression levels did you specify for bz2 > and gz? > -- >

Re: [gentoo-user] Compression tools Compared

2005-08-17 Thread Kirk Strauser
On Friday 12 August 2005 23:58, Jerry McBride wrote: > What you're seeing are the results of compressing /lib on my gentoo > powered laptop. For comparison purposes, what compression levels did you specify for bz2 and gz? -- Kirk Strauser -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Compression tools Compared

2005-08-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:53:05 -0400, Matt Randolph wrote: > In an effort to put this matter to rest (and to save a little face), I > have tested 7-zip. Or you could have read the README that covers this in some details. It not only says that you should use tar to preserve ownership and permission

Re: [gentoo-user] Compression tools Compared

2005-08-16 Thread Matt Randolph
Matt Randolph wrote: Matt Randolph wrote: This may be a case of a different paradigm being used by 7-zip than that used by traditional (*nix) compression tools. If my memory serves me, the 7-zip format is very similar to the pkzip format in its usage. By that I mean that one is not requi

Re: [gentoo-user] Compression tools Compared

2005-08-16 Thread Matt Randolph
Matt Randolph wrote: Nick Rout wrote: On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 09:36 -0400, Jerry McBride wrote: On Saturday 13 August 2005 01:32 am, Nick Rout wrote: On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 00:58 -0400, Jerry McBride wrote: Anyone else here subscribe to the LINUX JOURNAL? In the September issue t

Re: [gentoo-user] Compression tools Compared

2005-08-16 Thread Matt Randolph
Nick Rout wrote: On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 09:36 -0400, Jerry McBride wrote: On Saturday 13 August 2005 01:32 am, Nick Rout wrote: On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 00:58 -0400, Jerry McBride wrote: Anyone else here subscribe to the LINUX JOURNAL? In the September issue there's a neat article

Re: [gentoo-user] Compression tools Compared

2005-08-15 Thread Nick Rout
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 09:36 -0400, Jerry McBride wrote: > On Saturday 13 August 2005 01:32 am, Nick Rout wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 00:58 -0400, Jerry McBride wrote: > > > Anyone else here subscribe to the LINUX JOURNAL? > > > > > > In the September issue there's a neat article titled tha sam

Re: [gentoo-user] Compression tools Compared

2005-08-13 Thread fire-eyes
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 11:49 -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote: > So what's the problem? You'll be using something like "tar | 7z" or > whatever > the command for lzma is. I mean, tar handles ownership and > permissions. Or am > I missing something? I could be missing something, my brain isn't working

Re: [gentoo-user] Compression tools Compared

2005-08-13 Thread Norberto Bensa
Jerry McBride wrote: > One side note, 7za does not record user/group > info... It's a shame too as this make it pretty much useless in most linux > backup scenarios. So what's the problem? You'll be using something like "tar | 7z" or whatever the command for lzma is. I mean, tar handles ownershi

Re: [gentoo-user] Compression tools Compared

2005-08-13 Thread Zac Medico
fire-eyes wrote: Sounds like P7 doesn't have the capability to remember user names group names etc, definately a "i'd try it" killer for me. If it's anything like gzip or bzip2 then the compression algorithm does not need to support anything like usernames or groups. That stuff is handled b

Re: [gentoo-user] Compression tools Compared

2005-08-13 Thread Jerry McBride
On Saturday 13 August 2005 01:32 am, Nick Rout wrote: > On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 00:58 -0400, Jerry McBride wrote: > > Anyone else here subscribe to the LINUX JOURNAL? > > > > In the September issue there's a neat article titled tha same as the > > subject line of this message. > > > > The skinny is,

Re: [gentoo-user] Compression tools Compared

2005-08-13 Thread fire-eyes
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 05:44 -0700, Stephen Micheals wrote: > ive used lzma for a while in windows using 7zip but have not had much > time to test it in linux using p7zip yet. (emerge p7zip) > Sounds like P7 doesn't have the capability to remember user names group names etc, definately a "i'd try i

Re: [gentoo-user] Compression tools Compared

2005-08-13 Thread Stephen Micheals
ive used lzma for a while in windows using 7zip but have not had much time to test it in linux using p7zip yet. (emerge p7zip) On 8/13/05, fire-eyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 12:13 +, Fernando Meira wrote: > > Hi, > > that lzma is quite impressive!! > > Interesting, t

Re: [gentoo-user] Compression tools Compared

2005-08-13 Thread fire-eyes
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 12:13 +, Fernando Meira wrote: > Hi, > that lzma is quite impressive!! Interesting, there is an .ebuild in the source too ;) It's not in portage, however. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Compression tools Compared

2005-08-13 Thread Fernando Meira
Hi, that lzma is quite impressive!! Is not my purpose to hijack this topic, but I was wondering if anyone is kind enough to give me some comments about linux magazines. I been looking into that for some time, but not enough to subscribe one, as I wish to do. I know about Linux Journal and Linux Ma

Re: [gentoo-user] Compression tools Compared

2005-08-12 Thread Nick Rout
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 00:58 -0400, Jerry McBride wrote: > Anyone else here subscribe to the LINUX JOURNAL? > > In the September issue errr *grumble* yes but in this part of the world we actually get the september issue in september, not the start of august! -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --

Re: [gentoo-user] Compression tools Compared

2005-08-12 Thread Nick Rout
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 00:58 -0400, Jerry McBride wrote: > Anyone else here subscribe to the LINUX JOURNAL? > > In the September issue there's a neat article titled tha same as the subject > line of this message. > > The skinny is, there's some really nice file compressors out there and I > neve