2014-08-01 6:22 GMT-06:00 Nilesh Govindrajan :
>
> Why it shouldn't matter? What if a package's building process depends on
> some other package? Though the build process isn't for a completely
> different arch, it might matter. That's my doubt.
>
>
If you want to build packages(tbz2), especifical
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 06:00 -0600, Jc García wrote:
> 2014-08-01 5:51 GMT-06:00 Neil Bothwick :
> > On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 05:45:36 -0600, Jc García wrote:
> >
> >> > systemd-nspawn seems to be interesting. But will it work on my i5?
> >> > Because I prefer to use -march=native. For using distcc I copi
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 06:00 -0600, Jc García wrote:
> 2014-08-01 5:51 GMT-06:00 Neil Bothwick :
> > On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 05:45:36 -0600, Jc García wrote:
> >
> >> > systemd-nspawn seems to be interesting. But will it work on my i5?
> >> > Because I prefer to use -march=native. For using distcc I copi
2014-08-01 5:51 GMT-06:00 Neil Bothwick :
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 05:45:36 -0600, Jc García wrote:
>
>> > systemd-nspawn seems to be interesting. But will it work on my i5?
>> > Because I prefer to use -march=native. For using distcc I copied all
>> > the flags that gcc selects in march=native mode to
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 05:45:36 -0600, Jc García wrote:
> > systemd-nspawn seems to be interesting. But will it work on my i5?
> > Because I prefer to use -march=native. For using distcc I copied all
> > the flags that gcc selects in march=native mode to make.conf.
> >
> >
> I don't think what CFLAG
2014-08-01 2:01 GMT-06:00 Nilesh Govindrajan :
> On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 08:53 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:59:56 +1000, wraeth wrote:
>>
>> > systemd-nspawn is quite a useful utility for working in a chroot -
>> > almost a complete virtual machine without the overhead.
>> >
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 13:55 +0530, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
> I wouldn't have taken interest in that one if I didn't have systemd. I'm
> using GNOME3 on both my desktop and the laptop, so systemd is a must.
Yes, well, I thought it prudent just to make sure ;)
--
wraeth
signature.asc
Descripti
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 18:23 +1000, wraeth wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 13:31 +0530, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
> > systemd-nspawn seems to be interesting. But will it work on my i5?
> > Because I prefer to use -march=native. For using distcc I copied all the
> > flags that gcc selects in march=nat
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 13:31 +0530, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
> systemd-nspawn seems to be interesting. But will it work on my i5?
> Because I prefer to use -march=native. For using distcc I copied all the
> flags that gcc selects in march=native mode to make.conf.
systemd-nspawn is described as "a
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 13:31:09 +0530, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
> systemd-nspawn seems to be interesting. But will it work on my i5?
> Because I prefer to use -march=native. For using distcc I copied all the
> flags that gcc selects in march=native mode to make.conf.
.
Do the same for systemd-nspawn
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 08:53 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:59:56 +1000, wraeth wrote:
>
> > systemd-nspawn is quite a useful utility for working in a chroot -
> > almost a complete virtual machine without the overhead.
> >
> > I also came across a handy introduction to it [1
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:59:56 +1000, wraeth wrote:
> systemd-nspawn is quite a useful utility for working in a chroot -
> almost a complete virtual machine without the overhead.
>
> I also came across a handy introduction to it [1] too, by none other
> than rich0 (one of our esteemed devs) - it's
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 00:46 -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> If you are using systemd, even better, use systemd-nswpan.
systemd-nspawn is quite a useful utility for working in a chroot -
almost a complete virtual machine without the overhead.
I also came across a handy introduction to it [1] t
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
> What's the easiest way to compile Gentoo for another amd64 machine? I have a
> i5 desktop, and the laptop I have seems to be a subset of corei7 as per GCC
> native option.
> The basic installation was done using distcc, but it's not as
14 matches
Mail list logo
