Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
>One more question if I might. What does this message mean? I'm
> guessing that a patch in my patch file has already been applied in
> gentoo-sources? If so then it would seem that I'd want to skip it. Is
> that correct? Skipping the patch would seem reasonable if that'
Hi,
One more question if I might. What does this message mean? I'm
guessing that a patch in my patch file has already been applied in
gentoo-sources? If so then it would seem that I'd want to skip it. Is
that correct? Skipping the patch would seem reasonable if that's what
this means.
Or am
Christian,
Again, thanks for the info. It's very helpful. I'll investigate
this more this evening.
cheers,
Mark
On 7/7/05, Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On 7/7/05, Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Christian,
> >Thanks for the respons
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On 7/7/05, Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Christian,
>Thanks for the response. There were just two problems, as best I
> can tell. One was in the upper level makefile which the second was in
> a more tecnical piece of code. I'm providing the output here m
On 7/7/05, Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
> > QUESTIONS:
> >
> > 1) Can I assume that whatever happened with the "Hunk #x succeeded"
> > that everything is OK? Maybe this was just a line number issue?
> Yeah .. or and indent change or something similar.
>
> >
> > 2
Mark Knecht wrote:
> QUESTIONS:
>
> 1) Can I assume that whatever happened with the "Hunk #x succeeded"
> that everything is OK? Maybe this was just a line number issue?
Yeah .. or and indent change or something similar.
>
> 2) What can I do about the "Hunk #x FAILED" messages?
Well to get tha
6 matches
Mail list logo
