Re: [gentoo-user] seamonkey + updates

2007-01-03 Thread Mark Shields
On 1/3/07, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 03 January 2007 13:58, Nelson, David (ED, PAR&D) wrote: > > is it possible to build seamonkey without the whole updating > > (and check-for-update) stuff ? > > > > > > thx > > emerge sync && emerge -u seamonkey > > That's the only

Re: [gentoo-user] seamonkey + updates

2007-01-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 13:58, Nelson, David (ED, PAR&D) wrote: > > is it possible to build seamonkey without the whole updating > > (and check-for-update) stuff ? > > > > > > thx > > emerge sync && emerge -u seamonkey > > That's the only way I can think of Seamonkey (and Mozilla/Netsca

RE: [gentoo-user] seamonkey + updates

2007-01-03 Thread
> -Original Message- > From: Enrico Weigelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 December 2006 14:26 > To: gentoo-user > Subject: [gentoo-user] seamonkey + updates > > > > Hi folks, > > is it possible to build seamonkey without the whole updating > (and check-for-update) stuff ? > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] seamonkey + updates

2006-12-31 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 27 December 2006 15:26, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > is it possible to build seamonkey without the whole updating > > (and check-for-update) stuff ? > > I have absolutely no idea about what this question means... Seamonkey has some updat

Re: [gentoo-user] seamonkey + updates

2006-12-31 Thread Kellystewart00
ct: Re: [gentoo-user] seamonkey + updates On Wednesday 27 December 2006 15:26, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > is it possible to build seamonkey without the whole updating > (and check-for-update) stuff ? I have absolutely no idea about what this question means... -- Bo Andresen -- gentoo-use

Re: [gentoo-user] seamonkey + updates

2006-12-31 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 27 December 2006 15:26, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > is it possible to build seamonkey without the whole updating > (and check-for-update) stuff ? I have absolutely no idea about what this question means... -- Bo Andresen pgpMFQJFyE9yS.pgp Description: PGP signature