On Saturday 29 Oct 2016 12:56:46 Andrew Lowe wrote:
> Anyone seeing this again? I've just sync'd to two servers in Australia,
> and then, for the hell of it, one in Canada and am getting it for:
>
> dev-libs/botan
> app-arch/tar
> media-video/libav
> app-crypt/qca
> net-print/cups-filters
Here in Toronto at c 2016-10-08 20:30 EDT ,
I successfully emerged Bash Man-pages Cronbase ,
but ran into the digest problem with 7 'libX...' pkgs.
I've no idea which mirror it used for 'eix-sync',
but the source was probably downloaded from Waterloo Ont.
I'll simply leave them till next Sat, wh
On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 15:59:59 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Håkon Alstadheim
>
> wrote:
> > Den 08. okt. 2016 11:24, skrev Bill Kenworthy:
> >> On 08/10/16 16:49, Mick wrote:
> >>> On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016
On 08/10/16 20:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Håkon Alstadheim
wrote:
Den 08. okt. 2016 11:24, skrev Bill Kenworthy:
On 08/10/16 16:49, Mick wrote:
On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
On
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Håkon Alstadheim
wrote:
> Den 08. okt. 2016 11:24, skrev Bill Kenworthy:
>> On 08/10/16 16:49, Mick wrote:
>>> On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kaps
Den 08. okt. 2016 11:24, skrev Bill Kenworthy:
> On 08/10/16 16:49, Mick wrote:
>> On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> I've been getting this output since last night
On 08/10/16 16:49, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
>>> On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
I've been getting this output since last night.
Calculating dependencies ... ... don
On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> > On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> >> I've been getting this output since last night.
> >>
> >> Calculating dependencies ... ... done!
> >> [ebuild U ] app-shel
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>>
>> I've been getting this output since last night.
>>
>> Calculating dependencies ... ... done!
>> [ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-4.3_p48 [4.3_p46-r1]
>
> [snip]
> ...
> ...
> [snip]
>>
>> O
On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
I've been getting this output since last night.
Calculating dependencies ... ... done!
[ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-4.3_p48 [4.3_p46-r1]
[snip]
...
...
[snip]
Or is there some other way to fix this, like running 'ebuild
/path/to/ebuild manif
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 06:52:20PM -0400, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>Hello,
>I have done several
>emerge --sync
>today but the digest verification problem below does not go away.
>Any thoughts?
>Thank you.
This has been reported in Bug 579204 [0] and, as far as I am aware, w
On Thursday 06 November 2008 19:14:57 de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Any inputs on what this problem might be? Any use of --searchdesc will
> result in a similar output.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Valmor
>
> -> emerge --searchdesc eclipse
> Searching... \!!! Digest verification failed:
> !!!
On Feb 19, 2008 7:25 AM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:08:41 -0500, Robert Stockdale IV wrote:
>
> > I't has been some time since I ran a
> > Gentoo based system and I'm hoping I don't do something to break it. I
> > hate reinstalling as I usually loose files an
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:08:41 -0500, Robert Stockdale IV wrote:
> I't has been some time since I ran a
> Gentoo based system and I'm hoping I don't do something to break it. I
> hate reinstalling as I usually loose files and time.
With the time it takes for a full reinstall and the amount of
docum
On Feb 17, 2008 7:15 PM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:57:13 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote:
>
> > I also don't think straight without breakfast, so I'm sorry about the
> > last email.. it wasn't very professional of me :>
>
> How does that differ from the rest of u
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:57:13 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote:
> I also don't think straight without breakfast, so I'm sorry about the
> last email.. it wasn't very professional of me :>
How does that differ from the rest of us? :-)
> On a side note: the reason I hate -user is it completely breaks cla
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:47:36 +
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:32:25 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote:
>
> > yawn, and if the download was invalid it would most likely fail to
> > untar or something similar. I fail to see the point.
>
> That's because you are assu
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:32:25 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote:
> yawn, and if the download was invalid it would most likely fail to
> untar or something similar. I fail to see the point.
That's because you are assuming that all file corruption is accidental,
whereas the manifest system is designed to p
On Sunday 17 February 2008, Kenneth Prugh wrote:
> > !!! Digest verification failed:
> > !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2
> > !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
> > !!! Got: 37480419
> > !!! Expected: 6794016
> >
> > Is there a problem with the digest? Is t
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:25:11 +
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:15:06 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote:
>
> > A temporary solution:
> >
> > cd /usr/portage/www-client/mozilla-firefox/ && rm Manifest && ebuild
> > mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.12.ebuild manifest
>
> s/temp
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:15:06 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote:
> A temporary solution:
>
> cd /usr/portage/www-client/mozilla-firefox/ && rm Manifest && ebuild
> mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.12.ebuild manifest
s/temporary/terrible/
This message means that either the portage tree contains the wrong
checksum
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:03:21 -0500
"Robert Stockdale IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been trying to complete a
> glsa-check -f affected
> for the past 2 days.
> The latest problem I have encountered is:
>
> >>> Downloading '
> http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/firefox-2.0.0.11-source.
On Feb 17, 2008 8:07 AM, Alexander Meinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Robert Stockdale IV wrote:
> | * checking firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2 ;-)
> | ...
>
> | [ !! ]
> |
> | !!! Digest verification failed:
> | !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/fire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Stockdale IV wrote:
| * checking firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2 ;-)
| ...
| [ !! ]
|
| !!! Digest verification failed:
| !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2
| !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
| !!! Got
On 19:54 Tue 20 Mar , Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 March 2007 19:28:26 Vikas Kumar wrote:
> > today after emerge --sync when i did emerge -pvuDN world, i got this
> >
> > # emerge -pvuDN world
> >
> > These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> >
> > Calculating world
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 19:28:26 Vikas Kumar wrote:
> today after emerge --sync when i did emerge -pvuDN world, i got this
>
> # emerge -pvuDN world
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating world dependencies \!!! Digest verification failed:
> !!! /usr/portage/gno
From: "Stuart Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed:
qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:55:50 +0100
Thanks a lot! qt is currently compiling! :)
Keep hacking!
mcc
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149809
Have a look at this, should help
On 25/10/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:08:42 +0200, Régis Décamps wrote:
> So I'd say there is a problem in the ebuild. Maybe you should copy the
> ebuild in an overlay director
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:08:42 +0200, Régis Décamps wrote:
> So I'd say there is a problem in the ebuild. Maybe you should copy the
> ebuild in an overlay directory and regenerate it with
> ebuild qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.ebuild digest
You don;t need to copy an ebuild to an overlay to re-digest
On 10/25/06, Meino Christian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I got this:
>>> Downloading
'ftp://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/Linux/gentoo/distfiles/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz'
--06:23:28--
ftp://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/Linux/gentoo/distfiles/qt-x11
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 03:41:39 +0200
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
...[snip]...
> Since the offending file is in the portage tree rather than in
> distfiles it doesn't make a lot of sense to delete it since only a
> sync will be able to refetch it anyway. Had it been in distfiles then
> Dales suggestion
On Sunday 01 October 2006 02:23, David Relson wrote:
> In the last few days I've been encountering lots of "Digest
> verification failed" messages indicating SHA256 verification
> problems (see below).
>
> Searching the web, I've found the "generate your own" digest solution,
> i.e. "ebuild ...pac
David Relson wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> In the last few days I've been encountering lots of "Digest
> verification failed" messages indicating SHA256 verification
> problems (see below).
>
> Searching the web, I've found the "generate your own" digest solution,
> i.e. "ebuild ...package...ebuild dige
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 14:29 -0400, Dave Nebinger wrote:
> > I can't figure out how to get past it.
>
> After changing the ebuild, type "ebuild mailman-xxx.ebuild digest". This
> fixes the digest values.
>
> You should then be able to emerge mailman w/o resync.
>
>
or type emerge --digest mail
> I can't figure out how to get past it.
After changing the ebuild, type "ebuild mailman-xxx.ebuild digest". This
fixes the digest values.
You should then be able to emerge mailman w/o resync.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daevid Vincent wrote:
> It seems lately (within the past few months), I am seeing a lot more of
> these:
>
> !!! Digest verification Failed:
> !!!/usr/portage/distfiles/foo-1.2.3.tar.gz
> !!! Reason: Failed on MD5 verification
>
This is probably
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:48:10 -0700, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> I would use --skipfirst, but that doesn't work with "emerge -Davu
> world"... *sigh*.
--skipfirst only works in conjunction with --resume
emerge -avuD world
something fails
emerge --resume --skipfirst
--
Neil Bothwick
Another casual
> Anyone know why the digests are failing so frequently? Are they packaged
> poorly? Is it the mirror I'm getting them from? But then that begs the
> question, aren't the mirrors synchronized and MD5 verified with each
> other?
> Shouldn't TCP/IP be safe in that it retries a packet until it gets it
38 matches
Mail list logo
