> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 January 2006 00:55
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: k3b and now NTFS access rights
>
> There is, set a suitable umask value. By default, NTFS par
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 14:10:40 -, Michael Kintzios wrote:
> So if a suitable umask sorts out the mounting of ntfs partitions, what's
> the recommended umask and fstab entries for a dvdrw,cdrw and
> dvdrom,cdrom?
You really need to read the mount man page. umask is only for certain
filesystems, i
> -Original Message-
> From: Stroller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 January 2006 13:32
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: k3b and now NTFS access rights
>
>
>
> On 5 Jan 2006, at 12:43, Michael Kintzios wrote:
> &g
On 5 Jan 2006, at 12:43, Michael Kintzios wrote:
I don't see your problem. This is how my fstab shows ntfs:
/dev/hdf9 /mnt/win/o ntfs rw,umask=0,posix=1,users,nls=utf8 0 0
I'm lost! What does posix=1 mean?
From `man mount`:
Mount options for ntfs
...posix=[0|1]
I
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Ruskin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 January 2006 22:49
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: k3b and now NTFS access rights
>
>
>
> I don't see your problem. This is how my fstab
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 22:01:51 +, Mick wrote:
> So, if I want to mount NTFS partitions by different users what am I
> supposed to do? Pile up the uid Nos? There must be a better way.
There is, set a suitable umask value. By default, NTFS partitions are
mounted readable only by the user that
6 matches
Mail list logo
