Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

2006-10-12 Thread pk
Neil Bothwick wrote: > emerge --update --deep --tree world will tell you why. I thought I did that, but I must have missed the xinit dependency and it's related minimal USE flag. Guess I was too tired... Thanks for the input! Best regards Peter K -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

2006-10-12 Thread Mick
On Thursday 12 October 2006 06:55, darren kirby wrote: > quoth the Daniel Barkalow: > > > What's up with this? I really don't want netkit-rsh installed > > > either...xsm changelog says nothing... > > > > You want to be looking at xinit's info; turns out you want the "minimal" > > USE flag if you d

Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

2006-10-11 Thread darren kirby
quoth the Daniel Barkalow: > > > > What's up with this? I really don't want netkit-rsh installed > > either...xsm changelog says nothing... > > You want to be looking at xinit's info; turns out you want the "minimal" > USE flag if you don't want to include the things used by the default > Xsession,

Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

2006-10-11 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, darren kirby wrote: > quoth the Daniel Barkalow: > > > emerge --update --deep --tree world will tell you why. > > > > It'll tell you what wants them, but not why. In particular, it > > doesn't specify why xinit-1.0.2-r6, which didn't need xsm on September > > 22nd, now does. >

Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

2006-10-11 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 12 October 2006 02:49, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > > > Does anyone know why they have appeared? I don't have them installed > > > previously and I am quite skeptical about "netkit-rsh" since it > > > installs rexec, rlogin and rsh. > > > > emerge --update --deep --tree world will tell you

Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

2006-10-11 Thread darren kirby
quoth the Daniel Barkalow: > > emerge --update --deep --tree world will tell you why. > > It'll tell you what wants them, but not why. In particular, it > doesn't specify why xinit-1.0.2-r6, which didn't need xsm on September > 22nd, now does. What's up with this? I really don't want netkit-rsh in

Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

2006-10-11 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:31:41 +0200, pk wrote: > > > Does anyone know why they have appeared? I don't have them installed > > previously and I am quite skeptical about "netkit-rsh" since it installs > > rexec, rlogin and rsh. > > emerge --update --deep

Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

2006-10-11 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 21:28 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:31:41 +0200, pk wrote: > > > Does anyone know why they have appeared? I don't have them installed > > previously and I am quite skeptical about "netkit-rsh" since it installs > > rexec, rlogin and rsh. > > emerge --u

Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

2006-10-11 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:31:41 +0200, pk wrote: > Does anyone know why they have appeared? I don't have them installed > previously and I am quite skeptical about "netkit-rsh" since it installs > rexec, rlogin and rsh. emerge --update --deep --tree world will tell you why. -- Neil Bothwick If a

[gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

2006-10-11 Thread pk
Hi! After a "emerge --sync" a while ago a couple of new packages has appeared on the "emerge radar", namely: x11-apps/xsm-1.0.1 & net-misc/netkit-rsh Does anyone know why they have appeared? I don't have them installed previously and I am quite skeptical about "netkit-rsh" since it installs rexe