On Friday 30 June 2006 23:36, Ryan Sims wrote:
> Well, that worked. Any thoughts about what happened? Or is it just
> one of the great ineffables.
Upstream probably changed the tarball without making a proper revision bump.
The developer who commited a change to the ebuild had the old version i
On 6/30/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 30 June 2006 21:54, Ryan Sims wrote:
> I find it strange that emerge can say "fully retrieved, nothing to do"
> and "Couldn't download" in the same breath. I've tried a few things
> like cleaning out distfiles and downloading the
On Friday 30 June 2006 21:54, Ryan Sims wrote:
> I find it strange that emerge can say "fully retrieved, nothing to do"
> and "Couldn't download" in the same breath. I've tried a few things
> like cleaning out distfiles and downloading the file manually, I can't
> seem to make portage happy.
De
This is odd:
Emerging (1 of 199) x11-proto/xextproto-7.0.2 to /
Resuming download...
Downloading
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/proto/xextproto-7.0.2.tar.bz2
--15:50:32--
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/proto/xextproto-7.0.2.tar.bz2
=> `/usr/portage/
4 matches
Mail list logo
