On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:11:09 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
> I was going to post a question as to whether anybody knew how many more
> revisions we're going to see to the Mozilla programs in the next couple
> days; I understand heavy development, but three upgrades in three days
> is a bit much even
Seems that someone filed the bug report this morning while I was at work:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100048
To "fix" it for now, I'm switching to the source-based version, which
is still compiling, but I assume it will be fine.
Sorry to have touched off a conflict, but thanks for the
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Holly Bostick wrote:
You don't have to insult me with a strong implication that I'm stupid or
something-- certainly over an issue that neither of us control
(Portage), and certainly not over behaviour that I have clearly
documented my experience of.
Geez.
Holly
I should
Tero Grundström schreef:
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>>
>> In this case, syncing less often wasn't an issue-- the reason I had to
>> upgrade to 1.0.6 was due to a GLSA.
>
>
>
>
> I don't find any GLSA on firefox-1.0.6. Even the official firefox release
> notes doesn't list any
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Tero Grundström wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Holly Bostick wrote:
In this case, syncing less often wasn't an issue-- the reason I had to
upgrade to 1.0.6 was due to a GLSA.
I don't find any GLSA on firefox-1.0.6. Even the official firefox release
notes doesn't list any se
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Holly Bostick wrote:
Benno Schulenberg schreef:
Holly Bostick wrote:
I understand heavy development, but three
upgrades in three days is a bit much even for me
Come on, Holly, when you're running unstable (~x86), you've got to
be ready to take frequent updates. Or, to
Benno Schulenberg schreef:
> Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>>I understand heavy development, but three
>>upgrades in three days is a bit much even for me
>
>
> Come on, Holly, when you're running unstable (~x86), you've got to
> be ready to take frequent updates. Or, to circumvent this, you
> could
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Holly Bostick wrote:
Tero Grundström schreef:
In any case, I'm not having any problems with firefox or tbird 1.0.6-r1
That's the real paradox here. I don't remember when was the last time I
had a problem with ff (actually I use only Galeon these days, compiled
against
Holly Bostick wrote:
> I understand heavy development, but three
> upgrades in three days is a bit much even for me
Come on, Holly, when you're running unstable (~x86), you've got to
be ready to take frequent updates. Or, to circumvent this, you
could sync less often: once a week works fine her
Tero Grundström schreef:
>
>> In any case, I'm not having any problems with firefox or tbird 1.0.6-r1
>
>
> That's the real paradox here. I don't remember when was the last time I
> had a problem with ff (actually I use only Galeon these days, compiled
> against ff) so it feels so stupid to comp
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Holly Bostick wrote:
I've gotta say, I'm getting tired of upgrading them (I saw the upgrade
to 1.0.6 two days ago, but waited; there was an upgrade to 1.0.6-r1,
which I took yesterday afternoon, and today I have to upgrade to 1.0.6-r2).
I'm getting tired of it too. I would
Zac Medico schreef:
> Patrick Rutkowski wrote:
>
>> On Friday 22 July 2005 23:31, Ryan Sims wrote:
>>
>>> I just upgraded to mozilla-thunderbird-bin-1.0.6-r1 and
>>> mozilla-firefox-bin-1.0.6-r1, and they seem to be conflicting with
>>> each other, i.e. when I install firefox, running thunderbird
Patrick Rutkowski wrote:
On Friday 22 July 2005 23:31, Ryan Sims wrote:
I just upgraded to mozilla-thunderbird-bin-1.0.6-r1 and
mozilla-firefox-bin-1.0.6-r1, and they seem to be conflicting with
each other, i.e. when I install firefox, running thunderbird gives me
a "/usr/libexec/mozilla-launch
On Friday 22 July 2005 23:31, Ryan Sims wrote:
> I just upgraded to mozilla-thunderbird-bin-1.0.6-r1 and
> mozilla-firefox-bin-1.0.6-r1, and they seem to be conflicting with
> each other, i.e. when I install firefox, running thunderbird gives me
> a "/usr/libexec/mozilla-launcher: can't find the br
I just upgraded to mozilla-thunderbird-bin-1.0.6-r1 and
mozilla-firefox-bin-1.0.6-r1, and they seem to be conflicting with
each other, i.e. when I install firefox, running thunderbird gives me
a "/usr/libexec/mozilla-launcher: can't find the browser :-(" error,
so I remerge thunderbird and it runs,
15 matches
Mail list logo
