At Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:07:10 +0100 Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:38:50 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
>> Note that users should place their customized local changes in the
>> /etc/portage directory, creating any needed files listed below that
>> do not exi
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:38:50 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> Note that users should place their customized local changes in the
> /etc/portage directory, creating any needed files listed below that
> do not exist.
Local changes go in /etc/make.conf, per-package changes go
in /etc/portage/.
At Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:02:35 +0100 Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:43:01 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> make.profile is for devs to make default system changes
>
> make.conf is for users to make customised system changes
>
>> /etc/portage/* is for users to make
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:43:01 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> make.profile is for devs to make default system changes
make.conf is for users to make customised system changes
> /etc/portage/* is for users to make customized local changes
In increasing order of priority.
--
Neil Bothwick
Top Ox
On Monday 23 July 2007, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> I was asking if some words should be at the very top of the man page
> stating that /etc/make.profile is the place for user changes.
It seems like you grasp it all, but just in case, here's the executive
summary:
make.profile is for devs to make de
At Mon, 23 Jul 2007 07:57:09 -0400 Mark Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/22/07, Allan Gottlieb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you. I was fooled by "man portage", but I should have know
>> better. That is, I knew full well, but forgot, that /usr/profile is
>> temporary and that u
On 7/22/07, Allan Gottlieb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At Sun, 22 Jul 2007 09:27:09 +0200 Dirk Heinrichs <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Samstag, 21. Juli 2007 schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
>
>> echo "dev-java/blackdown-jre nsplugin" >>
>> /etc/make.profile/package.use.mask echo "dev-java/blackdown-j
At Sun, 22 Jul 2007 09:27:09 +0200 Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Samstag, 21. Juli 2007 schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
>
>> echo "dev-java/blackdown-jre nsplugin" >>
>> /etc/make.profile/package.use.mask echo "dev-java/blackdown-jdk nsplugin"
>> >> /etc/make.profile/package.use.mask echo
Am Samstag, 21. Juli 2007 schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
> Oops I forgot the nsplugin. Is this the correct way to prevent
> nsplugin from being used for blackdown?
>
> echo "dev-java/blackdown-jre nsplugin" >>
> /etc/make.profile/package.use.mask echo "dev-java/blackdown-jdk nsplugin"
> >> /etc/make.pro
At Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:11:53 -0400 Allan Gottlieb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does this mean that
>
> echo "dev-java/blackdown-jre" >> /etc/make.profile/package.use.mask
> echo "dev-java/blackdown-jdk" >> /etc/make.profile/package.use.mask
> echo "dev-java/blackdown-java3d-bin" >> /etc/make
At Sat, 21 Jul 2007 08:52:23 +0200 Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Freitag, 20. Juli 2007 schrieb Florian Philipp:
>> Am Freitag 20 Juli 2007 16:41 schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
>> > I notice that I have the nsplugin use flag UNset. use.desc says
>> >
>> > nsplugin - Builds plugins for N
Am Freitag, 20. Juli 2007 schrieb Florian Philipp:
> Am Freitag 20 Juli 2007 16:41 schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
> > I notice that I have the nsplugin use flag UNset. use.desc says
> >
> > nsplugin - Builds plugins for Netscape compatible browsers
> >
> > Am I correct in believing that firefox is Netsca
At Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:57:24 +0200 Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Freitag 20 Juli 2007 16:41 schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
>> Am I correct in believing that firefox is Netscape compatible and
>> hence that I should enable this use flag?
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161835
Am Freitag 20 Juli 2007 16:41 schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
> I notice that I have the nsplugin use flag UNset. use.desc says
>
> nsplugin - Builds plugins for Netscape compatible browsers
>
> Am I correct in believing that firefox is Netscape compatible and
> hence that I should enable this use flag?
>
I notice that I have the nsplugin use flag UNset. use.desc says
nsplugin - Builds plugins for Netscape compatible browsers
Am I correct in believing that firefox is Netscape compatible and
hence that I should enable this use flag?
thanks,
allan
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
15 matches
Mail list logo