Am 20.09.2013 18:50, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>> OK. I send this message now and test another few reboots.
>
> Forgot to mention it: I also enabled mdadm.service.
That service is enabled here as well and running fine.
# systemctl status lvm2-activation-net.service
lvm2-activation-net.serv
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> I haven't yet worked through all your suggestions/descriptions.
>
> Edited USE-flags and dracut-modules, worked around bug
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485202
>
> and rebuilt kernel and initrd.
>
> Didn't activate LVs
I haven't yet worked through all your suggestions/descriptions.
Edited USE-flags and dracut-modules, worked around bug
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485202
and rebuilt kernel and initrd.
Didn't activate LVs ...
Now I edited fstab:
I had the option "systemd.automount" enabled, like
Am 20.09.2013 10:46, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> Sorry I took my time, I was busy.
>
> Well, yours' a complex setup. This is a similar, although simpler, version:
At first: thank your for the extended test setup you did and described
... I will dig through it as soon as I find time ... I am q
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 12.09.2013 20:23, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>
>> Stefan, what initramfs are you using?
>
> dracut, run via your kerninst-script.
>
>> Could you please explain how is exactly your layout? From drives to
>> partitions to PVs, VGs a
Am 13.09.2013 19:36, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> /usr/sbin/lvm
>
> which does not exist.
>
> I linked it from /sbin/lvm and this seems to help ... I still don't know
> exactly where this comes from ... still digging.
>
> I also removed lvm2 completely ... checked for lvm-related unit-files
Am 13.09.2013 15:33, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 13.09.2013 14:54, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>
>> new info here (for me):
>>
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480066#c19
>>
>> gotta test ... right now I don't have the time.
>
> first tests with "genkernel --udev ..." : negativ
Am 13.09.2013 14:54, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
> new info here (for me):
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480066#c19
>
> gotta test ... right now I don't have the time.
first tests with "genkernel --udev ..." : negative.
More details maybe later this evening.
new info here (for me):
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480066#c19
gotta test ... right now I don't have the time.
S
Am 12.09.2013 20:23, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> Stefan, what initramfs are you using?
dracut, run via your kerninst-script.
> Could you please explain how is exactly your layout? From drives to
> partitions to PVs, VGs and LVs? And throw in there also the LUKS and
> RAID (if used) setup. I w
On Thu, Sep 12 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> Really, whomever is recommending to set CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER_PATH is
> probably wrong. I can't find *one* place where it is recommended, and
> several where they explicitly say to leave the option in blank.
OK. The wiki will continue to say it
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 12.09.2013 18:22, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>
>> Really, whomever is recommending to set CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER_PATH is
>> probably wrong. I can't find *one* place where it is recommended, and
>> several where they explicitly say
Am 12.09.2013 18:22, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> Really, whomever is recommending to set CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER_PATH is
> probably wrong. I can't find *one* place where it is recommended, and
> several where they explicitly say to leave the option in blank.
So ... I agree with this.
What to do
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:10 AM, wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12 2013, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>> Am 12.09.2013 08:50, schrieb Mick:
>>> On Wednesday 11 Sep 2013 12:38:23 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 11.09.2013 13:22, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Failed to set a proper state for noti
On Thu, Sep 12 2013, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 12.09.2013 08:50, schrieb Mick:
>> On Wednesday 11 Sep 2013 12:38:23 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>> Am 11.09.2013 13:22, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Failed to set a proper state for notification semaphore
identified by cookie value
On Sep 12, 2013 8:04 AM, "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
>
> Am 12.09.2013 14:43, schrieb Mick:
>
> >> I don't have that binary. And some page on my way said the
> >> contrary: set it to empty and let udev (?) do that.
> >
> > Ha! Neither do I!
> >
> > # ls -la /sbin/hotplug ls: cannot access /sbi
Am 12.09.2013 14:43, schrieb Mick:
>> I don't have that binary. And some page on my way said the
>> contrary: set it to empty and let udev (?) do that.
>
> Ha! Neither do I!
>
> # ls -la /sbin/hotplug ls: cannot access /sbin/hotplug: No such
> file or directory
>
> I can honestly say that I c
On Thursday 12 Sep 2013 09:37:32 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 12.09.2013 08:50, schrieb Mick:
> > On Wednesday 11 Sep 2013 12:38:23 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> >> Am 11.09.2013 13:22, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> >>> Failed to set a proper state for notification semaphore
> >>> identified
Am 12.09.2013 08:50, schrieb Mick:
> On Wednesday 11 Sep 2013 12:38:23 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> Am 11.09.2013 13:22, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>> Failed to set a proper state for notification semaphore
>>> identified by cookie value
>>
>> Also found this:
>>
>> http://forums.gentoo.org
On Wednesday 11 Sep 2013 12:38:23 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 11.09.2013 13:22, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> > Failed to set a proper state for notification semaphore identified by
> > cookie value
>
> Also found this:
>
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-965446-view-previous.html?sid
Am 11.09.2013 13:22, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Failed to set a proper state for notification semaphore identified by
> cookie value
Also found this:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-965446-view-previous.html?sid=5c1f845f96ca4cf1a9c17d73501e232d
I have
# zgrep UEV /proc/config.gz
CONF
systemd-204
lvm2-2.0.2.99-r2
(lvm2 patched as mentioned in
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480066
this should only matter for activation)
-
See what happens here:
# lvcreate -n mlp-tmpl -L 11G VG02
/dev/VG02/mlp-tmpl: not found: device not cleared
Aborting. Failed to wipe start
On Sunday 06 January 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Robin Atwood
wrote:
> > On Friday 04 Jan 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Robin Atwood
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Having observed all the ranting, I thought I would try sys
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Robin Atwood wrote:
> On Friday 04 Jan 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Robin Atwood
>>
>> wrote:
>> > Having observed all the ranting, I thought I would try systemd on a
>> > laptop. It actually seems to work quite well and it i
On Friday 04 Jan 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Robin Atwood
>
> wrote:
> > Having observed all the ranting, I thought I would try systemd on a
> > laptop. It actually seems to work quite well and it is a lot faster.
> > However I am having trouble getting my
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Robin Atwood
wrote:
> Having observed all the ranting, I thought I would try systemd on a laptop.
> It actually seems to work quite well and it is a lot faster. However I am
> having trouble getting my LVM partitions mounted. I installed the LVM
> service unit from
Having observed all the ranting, I thought I would try systemd on a laptop. It
actually seems to work quite well and it is a lot faster. However I am having
trouble getting my LVM partitions mounted. I installed the LVM service unit
from the Gentoo Wiki but it never completes, timing-out on a jo
27 matches
Mail list logo
