Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0 [SOLVED]

2005-08-28 Thread Nick Rout
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 23:35 -0600, Joseph wrote: > On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 10:23 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:20:12 -0600, Joseph wrote: > > > > > Is there a way to check what IP the device has on the network? > > > I know the device MAC address and when I plug it IN, it ob

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0 [SOLVED]

2005-08-27 Thread Joseph
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 10:23 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:20:12 -0600, Joseph wrote: > > > Is there a way to check what IP the device has on the network? > > I know the device MAC address and when I plug it IN, it obtains one of > > the IP via DHCP. With > > arp -a IP > >

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-27 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:20:12 -0600, Joseph wrote: > Is there a way to check what IP the device has on the network? > I know the device MAC address and when I plug it IN, it obtains one of > the IP via DHCP. With > arp -a IP > arp -e > I can only check the MAC address. Is there a way to other

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread William Kenworthy
This seems to be similar to the dlink adsl modem I am using (no routing function). Think of the 192.168.0.0 network as being the network between the modem and the gateway machine. In my case, the 10. (equiv) networks are on the internal side of the gateway. My gateway machine runs dhcp on eth0 (

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread Nick Rout
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 15:56 -0600, Joseph wrote: > On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 08:34 +1200, Nick Rout wrote: > > > > Try this: > > > > on your desktop, which normally has a 10.0.0.x address, add a virtual > > entry for eth0, in other words give it another IP address in the > > subnet > > needed by the

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread Joseph
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 18:32 -0500, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote: > > Ethereal's CLI counterpart is tcpdump, (you can use tcpdump to make > capture > files for Ethereal) you could also look in your dhcpd's lease file, or > see if > it responds to a ping to 224.0.0.1. Yes, that was the missing puzz

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread Jonathan A. Kollasch
On Friday 26 August 2005 06:20 pm, Joseph wrote: > Is there a way to check what IP the device has on the network? > I know the device MAC address and when I plug it IN, it obtains one of > the IP via DHCP. With > arp -a IP > arp -e > I can only check the MAC address. Is there a way to other way

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread Joseph
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 19:04 -0300, José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández wrote: > > > Try this: > > > > > > on your desktop, which normally has a 10.0.0.x address, add a > virtual > > > entry for eth0, in other words give it another IP address in the > > > subnet > > > needed by the other device: > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández
On Friday 26 August 2005 18:56, Joseph wrote: > On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 08:34 +1200, Nick Rout wrote: > > Try this: > > > > on your desktop, which normally has a 10.0.0.x address, add a virtual > > entry for eth0, in other words give it another IP address in the > > subnet > > needed by the other dev

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread Joseph
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 08:34 +1200, Nick Rout wrote: > > Try this: > > on your desktop, which normally has a 10.0.0.x address, add a virtual > entry for eth0, in other words give it another IP address in the > subnet > needed by the other device: > > something like: > > ifconfig eth0:1 192.168.0

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread Nick Rout
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 11:50 -0600, Joseph wrote: > On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 13:38 -0400, Willie Wong wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 10:02:08AM -0600, Joseph wrote: > > > I have a device with an IP 192.168.0.1 which I need to access via > > > browser. > > > My PC gets an IP via DHCP from the router

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread Joseph
[snip] > Not sure what hardware you have around, but if you don't have a > crossover cable do you at least have a hub or switch? If you do, just > disable DHCP temporarilly on your PC and manually set the IP address to > 192.168.0.2, set the gateway to 192.168.0.1 and netmask to 255.255.255.0 >

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread Alec Shaner
Joseph wrote: On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 13:38 -0400, Willie Wong wrote: On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 10:02:08AM -0600, Joseph wrote: I have a device with an IP 192.168.0.1 which I need to access via browser. My PC gets an IP via DHCP from the router. What should I use for gateway? I've tired 192.168.0

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread Joseph
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 14:23 -0400, Willie Wong wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 11:50:29AM -0600, Joseph wrote: > > No, I set my firewall/router with my numbers. My main network is set to > > Gateway 10.0.0.1 and DHCP pool range (so other devices an get the IP > > automatically) is 10.0.0.150 - 1

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:50:29 -0600, Joseph wrote: > No, I set my firewall/router with my numbers. My main network is set to > Gateway 10.0.0.1 and DHCP pool range (so other devices an get the IP > automatically) is 10.0.0.150 - 10.0.0.180 > > But the deice I have has a preset from the factory s

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread A. Khattri
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Joseph wrote: > I could set my gateway to 192.168.0.1 and DHCP pool range to > 192.168.0.10 to 192.168.0.100 and it would work. Yes, you might need to do this temporarily until you change the IP of the device to what you normally use, then you can switch back afterwards. --

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread Willie Wong
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 11:50:29AM -0600, Joseph wrote: > No, I set my firewall/router with my numbers. My main network is set to > Gateway 10.0.0.1 and DHCP pool range (so other devices an get the IP > automatically) is 10.0.0.150 - 10.0.0.180 Okay, so far I follow you. You have a main network.

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread Joseph
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 13:38 -0400, Willie Wong wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 10:02:08AM -0600, Joseph wrote: > > I have a device with an IP 192.168.0.1 which I need to access via > > browser. > > My PC gets an IP via DHCP from the router. > > What should I use for gateway? I've tired 192.168.0.0

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread Willie Wong
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 10:02:08AM -0600, Joseph wrote: > I have a device with an IP 192.168.0.1 which I need to access via > browser. > My PC gets an IP via DHCP from the router. > What should I use for gateway? I've tired 192.168.0.0 192.168.0 huh? if you get the IP via DHCP, doesn't it also s

Re: [gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread Joseph
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 10:02 -0600, Joseph wrote: > I have a device with an IP 192.168.0.1 which I need to access via > browser. > My PC gets an IP via DHCP from the router. > What should I use for gateway? I've tired 192.168.0.0 192.168.0 > What DHCP pool range should I set my firewall to? > > A

[gentoo-user] sub-net 0.0.0.0

2005-08-26 Thread Joseph
I have a device with an IP 192.168.0.1 which I need to access via browser. My PC gets an IP via DHCP from the router. What should I use for gateway? I've tired 192.168.0.0 192.168.0 What DHCP pool range should I set my firewall to? Apparently, the device can be access directly, but for this I wo