Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Mittwoch, 22. April 2015, 10:18:06 schrieb Dale: > R0b0t1 wrote: > > I've been using 1.7 for some time now, I wouldn't have too many qualms > > using it. > > > > > > Well, I was wondering about other situations not this one. There are > quite a

Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 21/04/2015 20:54, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Alan McKinnon > > wrote: > > > > On 21/04/2015 07:28, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > > Is it normal for a stable virtua

Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages

R0b0t1 wrote: > I've been using 1.7 for some time now, I wouldn't have too many qualms using > it. > > Well, I was wondering about other situations not this one. There are quite a few virtuals in the tree. One recent change was the libav/ffmpeg. I'm sure there are others to. Dale :-) :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages

I've been using 1.7 for some time now, I wouldn't have too many qualms using it.

Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages

Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 22/04/2015 08:09, Dale wrote: >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> Turns out the virtual is working as designed - see Andreas's post >>> above I recall now a discussion on -dev about this ages ago, and a >>> consensus emerged then to keep things as they currently are (changing >>>

Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages

On 22/04/2015 08:09, Dale wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: >> Turns out the virtual is working as designed - see Andreas's post >> above I recall now a discussion on -dev about this ages ago, and a >> consensus emerged then to keep things as they currently are (changing >> it requires much effort and

Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Dale wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Turns out the virtual is working as designed - see Andreas's post > > above I recall now a discussion on -dev about this ages ago, and a > > consensus emerged then to keep things as they currently are (changing > > it require

Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages

Alan McKinnon wrote: > Turns out the virtual is working as designed - see Andreas's post > above I recall now a discussion on -dev about this ages ago, and a > consensus emerged then to keep things as they currently are (changing > it requires much effort and has all manner of effects on the tree).

Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages

On 21/04/2015 20:54, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Alan McKinnon > wrote: > > On 21/04/2015 07:28, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > Is it normal for a stable virtual to require an unstable package? > > > No, that is definitel

Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 21/04/2015 07:28, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > Is it normal for a stable virtual to require an unstable package? > > > No, that is definitely not how virtuals should work. > > It's either a bug in virtual/jdk-1.7 ebuild or more likely, st

Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Dienstag, 21. April 2015, 15:37:34 schrieb gottl...@nyu.edu: > On Tue, Apr 21 2015, Florian Gamböck wrote: > > > Am 21.04.2015 um 07:42 schrieb Alan McKinnon: > >> It's either a bug in virtual/jdk-1.7 ebuild or more likely, stable > >> request fo

Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages

On Tue, Apr 21 2015, Florian Gamböck wrote: > Am 21.04.2015 um 07:42 schrieb Alan McKinnon: >> It's either a bug in virtual/jdk-1.7 ebuild or more likely, stable >> request for icedtead-bin-7 is lagging behind. > > You are right, the stable request is still going on: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show

Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages

Am 21.04.2015 um 07:42 schrieb Alan McKinnon: It's either a bug in virtual/jdk-1.7 ebuild or more likely, stable request for icedtead-bin-7 is lagging behind. You are right, the stable request is still going on: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=546902 Obviously the virtual got stablei

Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages

On 21/04/2015 07:28, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > Is it normal for a stable virtual to require an unstable package? No, that is definitely not how virtuals should work. It's either a bug in virtual/jdk-1.7 ebuild or more likely, stable request for icedtead-bin-7 is lagging behind. I know the java

[gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages

Is it normal for a stable virtual to require an unstable package? Running 'emerge -auND' generates the following output on my system: Calculating dependencies ... done! [ebuild NS ~] dev-java/icedtea-bin-7.2.5.3 [6.1.13.5] USE="X alsa cups nsplugin -cjk -doc -examples (-selinux) -sou