Re: [gentoo-user] sddm-0.16.0 does not work with plain openrc

2017-10-15 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 15/10/2017 11:08, Arve Barsnes wrote: > > > On 15 October 2017 at 10:32, Alan McKinnon > wrote: > > On 14/10/2017 11:55, Arve Barsnes wrote: > > On 14 October 2017 at 08:37, Alan McKinnon > >

Re: [gentoo-user] sddm-0.16.0 does not work with plain openrc

2017-10-15 Thread Arve Barsnes
On 15 October 2017 at 10:32, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 14/10/2017 11:55, Arve Barsnes wrote: > > On 14 October 2017 at 08:37, Alan McKinnon > > wrote: > > > > A quick heads-up to anyone who like me uses sddm on a plain openrc > box > > with USE="-elogind -

Re: [gentoo-user] sddm-0.16.0 does not work with plain openrc

2017-10-15 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 14/10/2017 11:55, Arve Barsnes wrote: > On 14 October 2017 at 08:37, Alan McKinnon > wrote: > > A quick heads-up to anyone who like me uses sddm on a plain openrc box > with USE="-elogind -systemd" and upgrades to sddm-0.16.0 (recently > released) >

Re: [gentoo-user] sddm-0.16.0 does not work with plain openrc

2017-10-14 Thread Dale
Arve Barsnes wrote: > On 14 October 2017 at 08:37, Alan McKinnon > wrote: > > A quick heads-up to anyone who like me uses sddm on a plain openrc box > with USE="-elogind -systemd" and upgrades to sddm-0.16.0 (recently > released) > > That combination

Re: [gentoo-user] sddm-0.16.0 does not work with plain openrc

2017-10-14 Thread Arve Barsnes
On 14 October 2017 at 08:37, Alan McKinnon wrote: > A quick heads-up to anyone who like me uses sddm on a plain openrc box > with USE="-elogind -systemd" and upgrades to sddm-0.16.0 (recently > released) > > That combination does not work. The xdm service starts, sddm launches, > logs a message t

[gentoo-user] sddm-0.16.0 does not work with plain openrc

2017-10-13 Thread Alan McKinnon
Hi A quick heads-up to anyone who like me uses sddm on a plain openrc box with USE="-elogind -systemd" and upgrades to sddm-0.16.0 (recently released) That combination does not work. The xdm service starts, sddm launches, logs a message that doesn't look too ominous and then does ... nothing. No