Re: [gentoo-user] screen locker

2012-03-04 Thread Grant
>> [snip] >> > I've been using xautolock for years and years. What's good about it is you >> > can have any 'locker' you want. For now, I'm using feh in slideshow mode. >> > For another, you can specify another program as a 'killer' such as a >> > suspend >> > or hibernate script. However, for a t

Re: [gentoo-user] screen locker

2012-02-24 Thread Marc Joliet
Am Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:16:35 -0800 schrieb Grant : > >> [snip] > >> > I've been using xautolock for years and years. What's good about it is > >> > you > >> > can have any 'locker' you want. For now, I'm using feh in slideshow mode. > >> > For another, you can specify another program as a 'killer

Re: [gentoo-user] screen locker

2012-02-24 Thread ny6p01
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:10:45AM -0800, Grant wrote: > [snip] > > I've been using xautolock for years and years. What's good about it is you > > can have any 'locker' you want. For now, I'm using feh in slideshow mode. > > For another, you can specify another program as a 'killer' such as a suspe

Re: [gentoo-user] screen locker

2012-02-23 Thread Grant
>> [snip] >> > I've been using xautolock for years and years. What's good about it is you >> > can have any 'locker' you want. For now, I'm using feh in slideshow mode. >> > For another, you can specify another program as a 'killer' such as a >> > suspend >> > or hibernate script. However, for a t

Re: [gentoo-user] screen locker

2012-02-23 Thread Marc Joliet
Am Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:10:45 -0800 schrieb Grant : > [snip] > > I've been using xautolock for years and years. What's good about it is you > > can have any 'locker' you want. For now, I'm using feh in slideshow mode. > > For another, you can specify another program as a 'killer' such as a suspend

Re: [gentoo-user] screen locker

2012-02-23 Thread Grant
[snip] > I've been using xautolock for years and years. What's good about it is you > can have any 'locker' you want. For now, I'm using feh in slideshow mode. > For another, you can specify another program as a 'killer' such as a suspend > or hibernate script. However, for a traditional ss, I have

Re: [gentoo-user] screen locker

2012-02-19 Thread ny6p01
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 07:15:17PM -0500, Joshua Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Grant wrote: > > Has anyone found a screen locker they like?  I'd like to move away > > from xscreensaver.  It seems bloated plus it isn't working right for > > me anymore. > > > > slimlock looks inte

Re: [gentoo-user] screen locker

2012-02-19 Thread Joshua Murphy
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Grant wrote: > Has anyone found a screen locker they like?  I'd like to move away > from xscreensaver.  It seems bloated plus it isn't working right for > me anymore. > > slimlock looks interesting but the ebuild in the miramir overlay fails with: > > !!! Fetched f

Re: [gentoo-user] screen locker

2012-02-19 Thread Grant
>> Has anyone found a screen locker they like?  I'd like to move away >> from xscreensaver.  It seems bloated plus it isn't working right for >> me anymore. >> >> slimlock looks interesting but the ebuild in the miramir overlay >> fails with: >> >> !!! Fetched file: slimlock-.tar.gz VERIFY FAIL

Re: [gentoo-user] screen locker

2012-02-19 Thread Willie Matthews
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:35:19 -0800 Grant wrote: > Has anyone found a screen locker they like? I'd like to move away > from xscreensaver. It seems bloated plus it isn't working right for > me anymore. > > slimlock looks interesting but the ebuild in the miramir overlay > fails with: > > !!! Fe

[gentoo-user] screen locker

2012-02-19 Thread Grant
Has anyone found a screen locker they like? I'd like to move away from xscreensaver. It seems bloated plus it isn't working right for me anymore. slimlock looks interesting but the ebuild in the miramir overlay fails with: !!! Fetched file: slimlock-.tar.gz VERIFY FAILED! !!! Reason: Filesi