On Mon, 9 May 2011 09:15:33 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote
> On Mon, 9 May 2011 08:41:04 +0200, pat wrote:
>
> > Nothing :-( Same output as for user: "No scanners were identified. If
> > you were expecting something different, check that the scanner is
> > plugged in, turned on and detected by the san
On Monday 09 May 2011 08:41:04 pat wrote:
> On Sun, 8 May 2011 23:28:39 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote
>
> > On Mon, 9 May 2011 00:17:42 +0200, pat wrote:
> > > I've bought USB scanner CanoScan LiDE210 which is listed with status
> > > "complete" on sane-project. The driver backend name is "genesys".
On Mon, 9 May 2011 08:41:04 +0200, pat wrote:
> Nothing :-( Same output as for user: "No scanners were identified. If
> you were expecting something different, check that the scanner is
> plugged in, turned on and detected by the sane-find-scanner tool (if
> appropriate). Please read the documenta
On Sun, 8 May 2011 23:28:39 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote
> On Mon, 9 May 2011 00:17:42 +0200, pat wrote:
>
> > I've bought USB scanner CanoScan LiDE210 which is listed with status
> > "complete" on sane-project. The driver backend name is "genesys".
> >
> > I've followed the instructions on [1]. Th
On Mon, 9 May 2011 00:17:42 +0200, pat wrote:
> I've bought USB scanner CanoScan LiDE210 which is listed with status
> "complete" on sane-project. The driver backend name is "genesys".
>
> I've followed the instructions on [1]. The "sane-find-device -q" finds
> my scanner as:
> found USB scanner
Hello,
I've bought USB scanner CanoScan LiDE210 which is listed with status
"complete" on sane-project. The driver backend name is "genesys".
I've followed the instructions on [1]. The "sane-find-device -q" finds my
scanner as:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x190a [CanoScan],
6 matches
Mail list logo
