Re: [gentoo-user] samba vs. cifs

2010-05-05 Thread David W Noon
On Wed, 05 May 2010 23:20:01 +0200, Matt Harrison wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] samba vs. cifs: >On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 06:42:09PM +0200, KH wrote: [snip] >> specific (don't want to hear "moo"): Will I be able to mount a samba >> partition without setting the samb

Re: [gentoo-user] samba vs. cifs

2010-05-05 Thread Matt Harrison
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 06:42:09PM +0200, KH wrote: > Hi List, > > I just ran in a problem: > > net-fs/mount-cifs ("net-fs/mount-cifs" is blocking net-fs/samba-3.4.6) > > Somba is pulled in by the samba use-flag. The PC only is "client" to a > server running samba. Do I need samba for this anym

Re: [gentoo-user] samba vs. cifs

2010-05-05 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 05 May 2010 18:42:09 +0200, KH wrote: > net-fs/mount-cifs ("net-fs/mount-cifs" is blocking net-fs/samba-3.4.6) mount.cifs is now provided by Samba. > Somba is pulled in by the samba use-flag. The PC only is "client" to a > server running samba. Do I need samba for this anymore? More spe

[gentoo-user] samba vs. cifs

2010-05-05 Thread KH
Hi List, I just ran in a problem: net-fs/mount-cifs ("net-fs/mount-cifs" is blocking net-fs/samba-3.4.6) Somba is pulled in by the samba use-flag. The PC only is "client" to a server running samba. Do I need samba for this anymore? More specific (don't want to hear "moo"): Will I be able to m