On Sunday 21 February 2010 15:59:56 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 21 February 2010 16:16:51 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Sonntag 21 Februar 2010, Mick wrote:
> > > On 21 February 2010 14:03, Volker Armin Hemmann
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Sonntag 21 Februar 2010, Mick wrote:
> > > >> I
On Sunday 21 February 2010 16:16:51 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Sonntag 21 Februar 2010, Mick wrote:
> > On 21 February 2010 14:03, Volker Armin Hemmann
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Sonntag 21 Februar 2010, Mick wrote:
> > >> I know that some of you have been using reiser4 for some years now.
> >
On Sonntag 21 Februar 2010, Mick wrote:
> On 21 February 2010 14:03, Volker Armin Hemmann
>
> wrote:
> > On Sonntag 21 Februar 2010, Mick wrote:
> >> I know that some of you have been using reiser4 for some years now.
> >> How does it compare in performance and reliability in terms to
> >> reiser
On 21 February 2010 14:03, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> On Sonntag 21 Februar 2010, Mick wrote:
>> I know that some of you have been using reiser4 for some years now.
>> How does it compare in performance and reliability in terms to
>> reiserfs and xfs?
>>
> they don't even come close in performa
On Sonntag 21 Februar 2010, Mick wrote:
> I know that some of you have been using reiser4 for some years now.
> How does it compare in performance and reliability in terms to
> reiserfs and xfs?
>
they don't even come close in performance. XFS sucks with files who are not
multi megabyte in size.
I know that some of you have been using reiser4 for some years now.
How does it compare in performance and reliability in terms to
reiserfs and xfs?
A few years ago I remember there were problems compiling or running
some applications/libraries on reiser4 - are these problems now over?
Any gotchas
6 matches
Mail list logo