Re: [gentoo-user] procps: mysterious option

2016-12-14 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 04:43:56 +0100 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > Andrew Savchenko [16-12-14 17:07]: > > On Sat, 10 Dec 2016 05:06:54 +0100 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > for the options "-nN" and "-d" the manpage of procps mentions > > > the option "-f" is implied. > > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] procps: mysterious option

2016-12-14 Thread Meino . Cramer
Andrew Savchenko [16-12-14 17:07]: > On Sat, 10 Dec 2016 05:06:54 +0100 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > Hi > > > > for the options "-nN" and "-d" the manpage of procps mentions > > the option "-f" is implied. > > > > For SYNOPSIS all possible options are summarized as: > > procinfo [ -dDSbrhv ]

Re: [gentoo-user] procps: mysterious option

2016-12-14 Thread Marc Joliet
On Wednesday 14 December 2016 15:54:11 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Sat, 10 Dec 2016 05:06:54 +0100 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > Hi > > > > for the options "-nN" and "-d" the manpage of procps mentions > > the option "-f" is implied. > > > > For SYNOPSIS all possible options are summarized as:

Re: [gentoo-user] procps: mysterious option

2016-12-14 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016 05:06:54 +0100 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > Hi > > for the options "-nN" and "-d" the manpage of procps mentions > the option "-f" is implied. > > For SYNOPSIS all possible options are summarized as: > procinfo [ -dDSbrhv ] [ -nN ]. > > Furthermore the option "-f" isn't exp

[gentoo-user] procps: mysterious option

2016-12-09 Thread Meino . Cramer
Hi for the options "-nN" and "-d" the manpage of procps mentions the option "-f" is implied. For SYNOPSIS all possible options are summarized as: procinfo [ -dDSbrhv ] [ -nN ]. Furthermore the option "-f" isn't explained anywhere. What I don't understand here ? ;) Cheers Meino