On 05/12/2014 08:04 AM, Marc Joliet wrote:
> There have been, however, plenty of
> other candidates that I *almost* put in a kill file, but didn't, because no
> one
> has yet shown themselves to be simultaneously overly annoying and
> unknowledgeable.
>
Is that a challenge? ;-)
Dan
Am Mon, 12 May 2014 11:15:21 -0500
schrieb Dale :
> Marc Joliet wrote:
> > Am Mon, 12 May 2014 15:39:41 +0100
> > schrieb Peter Humphrey :
> >
> >> On Monday 12 May 2014 16:08:00 Marc Joliet wrote:
> >>
> >>> [1] He used to be a regular in gentoo-amd64, when it was still
> active; yes,
> >>> you k
Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Mon, 12 May 2014 15:39:41 +0100
> schrieb Peter Humphrey :
>
>> On Monday 12 May 2014 16:08:00 Marc Joliet wrote:
>>
>>> [1] He used to be a regular in gentoo-amd64, when it was still
active; yes,
>>> you know, the guy who wrote the longest emails ;) .
>>
>> ...and is the on
Am Mon, 12 May 2014 15:39:41 +0100
schrieb Peter Humphrey :
> On Monday 12 May 2014 16:08:00 Marc Joliet wrote:
>
> > [1] He used to be a regular in gentoo-amd64, when it was still active; yes,
> > you know, the guy who wrote the longest emails ;) .
>
> ...and is the only person ever to have fou
On Monday 12 May 2014 16:08:00 Marc Joliet wrote:
> [1] He used to be a regular in gentoo-amd64, when it was still active; yes,
> you know, the guy who wrote the longest emails ;) .
...and is the only person ever to have found his way into my kill file.
--
Regards
Peter
Am Sun, 11 May 2014 09:53:10 +0100
schrieb Mick :
> On Saturday 10 May 2014 10:33:19 William Kenworthy wrote:
> > Note that as I said in my original
> > email, "dirvish" really hammers a file system and only reiserfs seems to
> > withstand it though I have gotten errors with it in the past. Ive t
Am 11.05.2014 18:17, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> "mount" does not show me the subvol-id or subvol-name of a mounted
> btrfs-subvolume.
>
> Seems like a bug in util-linux to me, in other distros that seems to work.
>
> /proc/mounts and findmnt also don't display that info, does anyone know
>
On Sunday 11 May 2014 18:17:40 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 11.05.2014 14:35, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> > Am 10.05.2014 13:14, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> >> Looking forward to more learning.
> >> At first now a bit of weekend, afk.
> >
> > I also had ~180 GB free on one of my thinkp
Am 11.05.2014 14:35, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 10.05.2014 13:14, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
>> Looking forward to more learning.
>> At first now a bit of weekend, afk.
>
> I also had ~180 GB free on one of my thinkpads so I also added a
> btrfs-root there just for fun ;-)
>
> Had a
On 11/05/2014 14:29, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 11 May 2014 18:43:53 William Kenworthy wrote:
>
>> One reason I am moving from reiserfs is bitrot - I can see that reiserfs is
>> losing favour.
>
> I'd been given that impression too, so a month or two ago I converted my few
> reiserfs part
Am 10.05.2014 13:14, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Looking forward to more learning.
> At first now a bit of weekend, afk.
I also had ~180 GB free on one of my thinkpads so I also added a
btrfs-root there just for fun ;-)
Had a bit of fiddling with the boot-options but now I successfully
boote
On Sunday 11 May 2014 18:43:53 William Kenworthy wrote:
> One reason I am moving from reiserfs is bitrot - I can see that reiserfs is
> losing favour.
I'd been given that impression too, so a month or two ago I converted my few
reiserfs partitions to ext4. When I came to restoring the /usr/porta
On 05/11/14 16:53, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 10 May 2014 10:33:19 William Kenworthy wrote:
>> Note that as I said in my original
>> email, "dirvish" really hammers a file system and only reiserfs seems to
>> withstand it though I have gotten errors with it in the past. Ive tried
>> ext4 (takes onl
On Saturday 10 May 2014 10:33:19 William Kenworthy wrote:
> Note that as I said in my original
> email, "dirvish" really hammers a file system and only reiserfs seems to
> withstand it though I have gotten errors with it in the past. Ive tried
> ext4 (takes only a couple of backup sessions and its
Am 09.05.2014 21:59, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Aside from that I plugged a non-used older SSD into my SATA/USB-adapter
> and put a btrfs-root onto it ...
>
> After some fiddling I currently run my system booted from that ;-)
>
> Yes, sure, slow because of the external SSD right now .. .jus
On 05/08/14 19:57, William Kenworthy wrote:
> On 05/07/14 07:51, Marc Joliet wrote:
>> Am Wed, 07 May 2014 06:56:12 +0800
>> schrieb William Kenworthy :
>>
>>> On 05/06/14 18:18, Marc Joliet wrote:
Hi all,
I've become increasingly motivated to convert to btrfs. From what I've
OK, I am in the middle of copying over my data from my backups to the freshly
created btrfs file system :-) . Read more below.
Am Wed, 7 May 2014 00:53:07 +0200
schrieb Marc Joliet :
[...]
> While I am unsure of my choice of RAID level (some comments on LWN.net claim
> that the MD RAID 10 is more
Am 08.05.2014 20:14, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 08.05.2014 13:57, schrieb William Kenworthy:
>
>> I have had had very poor luck with ext anything and would hesitate it to
>> recommend it except for this very specific case where there is little
>> alternative - reiserfs is far better on pla
Am Thu, 08 May 2014 19:57:34 +0800
schrieb William Kenworthy :
> On 05/07/14 07:51, Marc Joliet wrote:
> > Am Wed, 07 May 2014 06:56:12 +0800
> > schrieb William Kenworthy :
> >
> >> On 05/06/14 18:18, Marc Joliet wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I've become increasingly motivated to convert to bt
Am 08.05.2014 13:57, schrieb William Kenworthy:
> I have had had very poor luck with ext anything and would hesitate it to
> recommend it except for this very specific case where there is little
> alternative - reiserfs is far better on platters for instance.
I would be interested in your experie
On 05/07/14 07:51, Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Wed, 07 May 2014 06:56:12 +0800
> schrieb William Kenworthy :
>
>> On 05/06/14 18:18, Marc Joliet wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've become increasingly motivated to convert to btrfs. From what I've
>>> seen,
>>> it has become increasingly stable; enough so
Am Wed, 7 May 2014 00:53:07 +0200
schrieb Marc Joliet :
[...]
> > This migration will occur in conjunction with a migration of / + /usr to a
> > cheap SSD that I just bought (Crucial M500 120 GB). The overall plan is
> > thus as
> > follows:
> >
> > Replace
> >
> > /boot on /dev/md1 (EXT3,
Am Wed, 07 May 2014 06:56:12 +0800
schrieb William Kenworthy :
> On 05/06/14 18:18, Marc Joliet wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've become increasingly motivated to convert to btrfs. From what I've
> > seen,
> > it has become increasingly stable; enough so that it is apparently supposed
> > to
> >
On 05/06/14 18:18, Marc Joliet wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've become increasingly motivated to convert to btrfs. From what I've seen,
> it has become increasingly stable; enough so that it is apparently supposed to
> become the default FS on OpenSuse in 13.2.
>
> I am motivated by various reasons:
..
OK, I read several articles (the LWN.net series from December/January [5] and a
January article from ars technica [6]) and quite a lot of comments on btrfs
today and can answer some of my questions myself.
For completions sake, I also read a zdnet article series (starting at [7]), but
it wasn't qu
Hi all,
I've become increasingly motivated to convert to btrfs. From what I've seen,
it has become increasingly stable; enough so that it is apparently supposed to
become the default FS on OpenSuse in 13.2.
I am motivated by various reasons:
- The experience of insignificant data loss after a r
26 matches
Mail list logo
