meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> ...and dont forget to do a
>
> ls -R . > ls-R
>
> in the according root directory, from where are all
> *.fmt are installed, otherwise kpathsea will fail to find the file.
Oh yeah, forgot about that.
> But what was the idea behind "tex" to behave like compilin
pk [09-06-28 19:37]:
> meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > /home/mccramer>virtex texfile.tex
> > This is TeXk, Version 3.1415926 (Web2C 7.5.7)
> > %&-line parsing enabled.
> >
> > kpathsea: Running mktexfmt plain.fmt
> > I can't find the format file `plain.fmt'!
> >
> >
> > /home/mccramer>locate
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> /home/mccramer>virtex texfile.tex
> This is TeXk, Version 3.1415926 (Web2C 7.5.7)
> %&-line parsing enabled.
>
> kpathsea: Running mktexfmt plain.fmt
> I can't find the format file `plain.fmt'!
>
>
> /home/mccramer>locate plainfmt.tex
Go to http://www.tug.org/texi
Arttu V. [09-06-28 13:52]:
> On 6/28/09, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Arttu V. [09-06-28 13:27]:
> >> man tex
> >>
> >> "When called as virtex it will use the plain format."
> >>
> >> Not sure if this is what is called "plainTeX", I've only used LaTeX.
> >
> > Yes, it is...
> > tetex leave
On 6/28/09, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Arttu V. [09-06-28 13:27]:
>> man tex
>>
>> "When called as virtex it will use the plain format."
>>
>> Not sure if this is what is called "plainTeX", I've only used LaTeX.
>
> Yes, it is...
> tetex leaves the names of the executables untouched...
>
>
Arttu V. [09-06-28 13:27]:
> On 6/28/09, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >> > All my *.tex-files are handled as they would be written in
> >> > LaTeX. But they are good old plainTeX.
> >> >
> >
> > or in other words:
> >
> > tex texfile.tex
> >
> > ends up in errors due to the fact, that "texfile.te
On 6/28/09, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>> > All my *.tex-files are handled as they would be written in
>> > LaTeX. But they are good old plainTeX.
>> >
>
> or in other words:
>
> tex texfile.tex
>
> ends up in errors due to the fact, that "texfile.tex" contains syntax
> with LaTeX dont understand.
Sebastian Günther [09-06-28 10:32]:
> Am Sun, 28 Jun 2009 06:30:58 +0200
> schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > after removing tetex and installing texlive-2008 by following
> > his guide
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/tex/texlive-migration-guide.xml
> > I run into a mysterious prob
Hung Dang [09-06-28 10:27]:
> meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after removing tetex and installing texlive-2008 by following
> > his guide
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/tex/texlive-migration-guide.xml
> > I run into a mysterious problem:
> > All my *.tex-files are handled as they wou
Am Sun, 28 Jun 2009 06:30:58 +0200
schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> Hi,
>
> after removing tetex and installing texlive-2008 by following
> his guide
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/tex/texlive-migration-guide.xml
> I run into a mysterious problem:
> All my *.tex-files are handled as they would be
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after removing tetex and installing texlive-2008 by following
> his guide
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/tex/texlive-migration-guide.xml
> I run into a mysterious problem:
> All my *.tex-files are handled as they would be written in
> LaTeX. But they are good
Hi,
after removing tetex and installing texlive-2008 by following
his guide
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/tex/texlive-migration-guide.xml
I run into a mysterious problem:
All my *.tex-files are handled as they would be written in
LaTeX. But they are good old plainTeX.
Where can I change thsi beh
12 matches
Mail list logo
