On 06/06/2020 23:11, Neil Bothwick wrote:
You don't boot from an encrypted drive (yet) or use unusual hardware,
that's what I meant by a plain system. Dracut handles booting from a a
btrfs root on a LUKS encrypted block device here with no fancy
configuration. It really is impressive the way it f
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, June 11, 2020 8:18 AM, antlists wrote:
> On 06/06/2020 23:11, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> > You don't boot from an encrypted drive (yet) or use unusual hardware,
> > that's what I meant by a plain system. Dracut ha
hey, when you come over bring your' sam's club card, so I can get a pallet of
coke.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, June 11, 2020 8:18 AM, antlists wrote:
> On 06/06/2020 23:11, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> > You don't boot from an encrypted drive
On 06/06/2020 23:11, Neil Bothwick wrote:
You don't boot from an encrypted drive (yet) or use unusual hardware,
that's what I meant by a plain system. Dracut handles booting from a a
btrfs root on a LUKS encrypted block device here with no fancy
configuration. It really is impressive the way it f
On 6/6/20 6:34 PM, Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 11:34:28 -0500, Dale wrote:
From what I've read, I like my way better. I did have to change the
names from bzimage* to kernel* but other than that, I can use the
naming method I've used for years and keep the good kernels
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 11:34:28 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
From what I've read, I like my way better. I did have to change the
names from bzimage* to kernel* but other than that, I can use the
naming method I've used for years and keep the good kernels I want.
>>> mak
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 11:34:28 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >> From what I've read, I like my way better. I did have to change the
> >> names from bzimage* to kernel* but other than that, I can use the
> >> naming method I've used for years and keep the good kernels I want.
> > make install names the kern
On 2020.06.06 12:34, Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 10:13:56 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
If you do copy yours manually to /boot, what command do you use
for
dracut? Maybe I'm doing it a hard way or something and you have
a
easier method.
>>> cd /usr/src/linux
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 10:13:56 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
If you do copy yours manually to /boot, what command do you use for
dracut? Maybe I'm doing it a hard way or something and you have a
easier method.
>>> cd /usr/src/linux
>>> make all modules_install install
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 10:13:56 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >> If you do copy yours manually to /boot, what command do you use for
> >> dracut? Maybe I'm doing it a hard way or something and you have a
> >> easier method.
> > cd /usr/src/linux
> > make all modules_install install
> > dracut --kver=$(cat
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:57:07 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> When you install your kernel, do you use make install or do you copy the
>> kernel to /boot manually? I do mine manually but also copy it manually
>> as well. That makes it hard for me to recall how to use the dracut
>> co
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:57:07 -0500, Dale wrote:
> When you install your kernel, do you use make install or do you copy the
> kernel to /boot manually? I do mine manually but also copy it manually
> as well. That makes it hard for me to recall how to use the dracut
> command. It requires a kernel
On Fri, 05 Jun 2020 16:48:30 -0400, Jack wrote:
> I used to do all my kernel configuration and setup manually on my old
> box (with legacy grub). When I upgraded to my new PC with a Ryzen 5
> 2600 and started using lvm, I ended up needing an initramfs, and
> managed to get genkernel working
Andrew Udvare wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 15:02, Jack wrote:
>> Thanks for any thoughts or suggestions.
>>
>> Jack
> I would keep GCC 9 for now. I've run into a few issues with GCC 10
> compiling various packages so I have kept GCC 9 on my system. There's
> not some serious detriment to not usi
On 2020.06.05 16:24, Andrew Udvare wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 15:02, Jack
wrote:
> Thanks for any thoughts or suggestions.
>
> Jack
I would keep GCC 9 for now. I've run into a few issues with GCC 10
compiling various packages so I have kept GCC 9 on my system. There's
not some serious d
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 15:02, Jack wrote:
> Thanks for any thoughts or suggestions.
>
> Jack
I would keep GCC 9 for now. I've run into a few issues with GCC 10
compiling various packages so I have kept GCC 9 on my system. There's
not some serious detriment to not using GCC 10 for 99% of people. Mo
I'm currently running a 5.6.10 kernel, compiled with genkernel along
with an initramfs. That was compiled with gcc-9.3.0. Since then,
using gcc-10.1.0, I have not successfully run genkernel. Initially it
was kernel compile failures due to the -fnocommon bug. With a patch,
the kernel com
17 matches
Mail list logo
