On Sunday 21 February 2010 18:18:18 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Sonntag 21 Februar 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Sunday 21 February 2010 11:44:18 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > > It's not possible to use Amarok with the "embedded" USE flag with the
> > > newly released MySQL 5.1. Why is tha
On Sonntag 21 Februar 2010, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> It's not possible to use Amarok with the "embedded" USE flag with the
> newly released MySQL 5.1. Why is that? Can we expect it to work at
> some point?
you can use amarok with embedded useflag. just unmerge it and emerge it again -
I just
On Sonntag 21 Februar 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 21 February 2010 11:44:18 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > It's not possible to use Amarok with the "embedded" USE flag with the
> > newly released MySQL 5.1. Why is that? Can we expect it to work at
> > some point?
>
> Do you mean it does
On Sunday 21 February 2010 11:44:18 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> It's not possible to use Amarok with the "embedded" USE flag with the
> newly released MySQL 5.1. Why is that? Can we expect it to work at
> some point?
Do you mean it doesn't work, or the upgrade is dogdy with blocker messages
tha
It's not possible to use Amarok with the "embedded" USE flag with the
newly released MySQL 5.1. Why is that? Can we expect it to work at
some point?
On 1/14/09, Marcin Niśkiewicz wrote:
> Hello
> Is it known when mysql version 5.1 will be available in portage for amd64
> (stable)?
I don't know if we on the *user* list really can know about the devs'
decisions. Maybe gentoo-dev list or irc channel could give better
answers? AFAIK the devs rare
Hello
Is it known when mysql version 5.1 will be available in portage for amd64
(stable)?
Thanks for answer
best regards
nichu
7 matches
Mail list logo