On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 10:51:20 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > THere's an ebuild on bgo that I've kept updated to the latest release,
> > I've attached it. However, it uses tesseract as the OCR engine, so I
> > would expect similar results.
> the ebuild you've shared has a dependency on
> perl-
On 11/30/2016 07:37:20 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:28:15 -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
> The next tool that looked like it might work, gscan2pdf, wasn't in
> portage, and with the semi-garbled output from tesseract suggesting
the
> scans were too poor quality, I didn't pursue
Did you train tesseract per chance? And could I get some sample images?
Landis
On 11/30/2016 12:28 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 05:34:25 PM J. Roeleveld wrote:
On November 30, 2016 6:03:36 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Mol
wrote:
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:43:13 A
2016-11-30 16:28 GMT-02:00 Michael Mol :
> On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 05:34:25 PM J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On November 30, 2016 6:03:36 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Mol <
> mike...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:43:13 AM J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > >> On Tuesday, November 29,
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:28:15 -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
> The next tool that looked like it might work, gscan2pdf, wasn't in
> portage, and with the semi-garbled output from tesseract suggesting the
> scans were too poor quality, I didn't pursue further.
THere's an ebuild on bgo that I've kept upd
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 05:34:25 PM J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On November 30, 2016 6:03:36 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Mol
wrote:
> >On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:43:13 AM J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:18:36 PM k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> >> > Michael Mol:
> >> > ...
On November 30, 2016 6:03:36 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Mol
wrote:
>On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:43:13 AM J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:18:36 PM k...@aspodata.se wrote:
>> > Michael Mol:
>> > ...
>> >
>> > > xsane would have let me do it during the scan process if I'd
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:43:13 AM J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:18:36 PM k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> > Michael Mol:
> > ...
> >
> > > xsane would have let me do it during the scan process if I'd thought of
> > > it
> > > then, but the scans are done, drives aren't
On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 01:33:48 PM Michael Mol wrote:
> So, I've got scans of a half dozen new hard drives, and I've got scans of
> their labels. One image has two drives, the other has four.
>
> Rather than manually transcribing the label contents into my intake ticket,
> I'd like to selec
On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:18:36 PM k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> Michael Mol:
> ...
>
> > xsane would have let me do it during the scan process if I'd thought of it
> > then, but the scans are done, drives aren't there any more. Something
>
> ...
>
> If xsane solves your need why don't you ju
Michael Mol:
...
> xsane would have let me do it during the scan process if I'd thought of it
> then, but the scans are done, drives aren't there any more. Something
...
If xsane solves your need why don't you just print your scans so xsane
can do its job ?
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
-
So, I've got scans of a half dozen new hard drives, and I've got scans of
their labels. One image has two drives, the other has four.
Rather than manually transcribing the label contents into my intake ticket,
I'd like to select a region of each image and OCR it. (Darn, it'd be handy if
they pu
12 matches
Mail list logo
