On Wednesday 03/30/11 17:14:00 CST, John Campbell wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 01:35 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>
> > I am not seeing mplayer2 in the tree -- unless it came in the last day
> > or so -- and which config takes the threads=5 parameter?
>
> It's in the multimedia overlay.
>
> The "t
John Campbell wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 01:35 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>
> > I am not seeing mplayer2 in the tree -- unless it came in the last day
> > or so -- and which config takes the threads=5 parameter?
>
> It's in the multimedia overlay.
>
> The "threads=#" (where # less than total
John Campbell wrote:
On 03/30/2011 01:35 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I am not seeing mplayer2 in the tree -- unless it came in the last day
or so -- and which config takes the threads=5 parameter?
It's in the multimedia overlay.
The "threads=#" (where # less than total threads available
On 03/30/2011 01:35 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I am not seeing mplayer2 in the tree -- unless it came in the last day
or so -- and which config takes the threads=5 parameter?
It's in the multimedia overlay.
The "threads=#" (where # less than total threads available on processor)
parame
John Campbell wrote:
> On 03/29/2011 08:01 AM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
>
> > While I've been quite pleased with mplayer as tweaked by Nikos
> > Chantziaras to allow Multi threading on my core-I7 (Nvidia) (and I
> > realize that MT will now be in the upstream distribution), I'm wondering
> > if mpla
On 03/29/2011 08:01 AM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
While I've been quite pleased with mplayer as tweaked by Nikos
Chantziaras to allow Multi threading on my core-I7 (Nvidia) (and I
realize that MT will now be in the upstream distribution), I'm wondering
if mplayer2 is now stable and better enough to me
6 matches
Mail list logo