Re: [gentoo-user] merge-usr and SPF implementations

On Friday, 29 March 2024 19:06:45 GMT Stefan Schmiedl wrote: > > > Michael wrote on Friday, 29. März 2024 18:53: > > My guess and this is only a guess, is the two binaries are in separate > > subdirectories of /usr and therefore there shouldn't be a problem. Before > > you progress with this

Re[2]: [gentoo-user] merge-usr and SPF implementations

Michael wrote on Friday, 29. März 2024 18:53:   > On Friday, 29 March 2024 16:05:29 GMT Stefan Schmiedl wrote: >> Greetings. >> After updating profiles, I decided to try switching to merged-user, too, >> following the wiki page at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Merge-usr >> One server reported durin

Re: [gentoo-user] merge-usr and SPF implementations

On Friday, 29 March 2024 16:05:29 GMT Stefan Schmiedl wrote: > Greetings. > > After updating profiles, I decided to try switching to merged-user, too, > following the wiki page at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Merge-usr > > One server reported during the dry run: > ERROR: Conflict for file '/usr/s

[gentoo-user] merge-usr and SPF implementations

Greetings. After updating profiles, I decided to try switching to merged-user, too, following the wiki page at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Merge-usr One server reported during the dry run: ERROR: Conflict for file '/usr/sbin/spfd': [Errno 17] File exists: '/usr/bin/spfd' # equery belongs /us