On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Todd Goodman wrote:
>
> So it looks like just udev-182-r2 depends upon it.
>
> Sorry for the misinformation.
>
> Todd
>
Not a problem.
So this problem is really just for folks running ~amd64 as all this
new udev stuff as well as kmod aren't marked stable, TTBOMK.
* Mark Knecht [120406 12:16]:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Todd Goodman wrote:
> > * Mark Knecht [120406 11:40]:
> > [..]
> >> To me it looks safe to emerge -C kmod and then emerge
> >> module-init-tools if you want to go that way. I'd do an equery files
> >> kmod and carefully study what y
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Todd Goodman wrote:
> * Mark Knecht [120406 11:40]:
> [..]
>> To me it looks safe to emerge -C kmod and then emerge
>> module-init-tools if you want to go that way. I'd do an equery files
>> kmod and carefully study what you're getting with that package, or
>> else
* Mark Knecht [120406 11:40]:
[..]
> To me it looks safe to emerge -C kmod and then emerge
> module-init-tools if you want to go that way. I'd do an equery files
> kmod and carefully study what you're getting with that package, or
> else push a bug request up to that package maintainer for providi
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 8:05 AM, András Csányi wrote:
> On 6 April 2012 16:57, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> I've been away for a few days so I'm possibly behind on an update but
>> modprobe -l works for me:
>>
>> c2stable ~ # which modprobe
>> /sbin/modprobe
>> c2stable ~ # equery belongs /sbin/modpro
On 6 April 2012 16:57, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> I've been away for a few days so I'm possibly behind on an update but
> modprobe -l works for me:
>
> c2stable ~ # which modprobe
> /sbin/modprobe
> c2stable ~ # equery belongs /sbin/modprobe
> * Searching for /sbin/modprobe ...
> sys-apps/module-init
On 6 April 2012 16:43, Joshua Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:02 AM, András Csányi wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I'm a little bit confused regarding modprobe command. As far as I
>> remember I used the command below to list all of kernel modules
>> independently it's loaded or not.
>> modpr
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:02 AM, András Csányi wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I'm a little bit confused regarding modprobe command. As far as I
> remember I used the command below to list all of kernel modules
> independently it's loaded or not.
> modprobe -l or modprobe -L
>
> But now I can see that there
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:02 AM, András Csányi wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I'm a little bit confused regarding modprobe command. As far as I
> remember I used the command below to list all of kernel modules
> independently it's loaded or not.
> modprobe -l or modprobe -L
>
> But now I can see that ther
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:02 AM, András Csányi wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I'm a little bit confused regarding modprobe command. As far as I
> remember I used the command below to list all of kernel modules
> independently it's loaded or not.
> modprobe -l or modprobe -L
>
> But now I can see that ther
Dear All,
I'm a little bit confused regarding modprobe command. As far as I
remember I used the command below to list all of kernel modules
independently it's loaded or not.
modprobe -l or modprobe -L
But now I can see that there is no -l or -L for this command. When
have changed this command or
11 matches
Mail list logo
