Neil Bothwick ha scritto:
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:15:09 +0100, bn wrote:
>
>> I have a stable x86 system that requires still a bit of updating, among
>> those libtool and gcc. Since I need the system to be usable *now* for
>> work reasons, I don't feel like updating gcc and rebuilding it all with
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:15:09 +0100, bn wrote:
> I have a stable x86 system that requires still a bit of updating, among
> those libtool and gcc. Since I need the system to be usable *now* for
> work reasons, I don't feel like updating gcc and rebuilding it all with
> an emerge -e system / emerge -
100226 bn wrote:
> I have a stable x86 system that requires still a bit of updating,
> among those libtool and gcc. Since I need the system to be usable *now*
> for work reasons, I don't feel like updating gcc and rebuilding it all
> with an emerge -e system / emerge -e world,
> but more and more p
Hi,
I have a stable x86 system that requires still a bit of updating, among
those libtool and gcc. Since I need the system to be usable *now* for
work reasons, I don't feel like updating gcc and rebuilding it all with
an emerge -e system / emerge -e world, but more and more packages want
to upgrad
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Dienstag 06 Oktober 2009, dhk wrote:
>> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>>> On Dienstag 06 Oktober 2009, dhk wrote:
I recently ran a make clean on a C/Gtk program I'm developing and now
can't run ./configure to rebuild it. It looks like all my libtool links
>
On Dienstag 06 Oktober 2009, dhk wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Dienstag 06 Oktober 2009, dhk wrote:
> >> I recently ran a make clean on a C/Gtk program I'm developing and now
> >> can't run ./configure to rebuild it. It looks like all my libtool links
> >> are broken. There were lin
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Dienstag 06 Oktober 2009, dhk wrote:
>> I recently ran a make clean on a C/Gtk program I'm developing and now
>> can't run ./configure to rebuild it. It looks like all my libtool links
>> are broken. There were links to the following files, but now those
>> files
On Dienstag 06 Oktober 2009, dhk wrote:
> I recently ran a make clean on a C/Gtk program I'm developing and now
> can't run ./configure to rebuild it. It looks like all my libtool links
> are broken. There were links to the following files, but now those
> files don't exist.
>
> /usr/share/libto
I recently ran a make clean on a C/Gtk program I'm developing and now
can't run ./configure to rebuild it. It looks like all my libtool links
are broken. There were links to the following files, but now those
files don't exist.
/usr/share/libtool/ltmain.sh
/usr/share/libtool/config.sub
/usr/shar
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:45:19 +0200 (CEST)
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> unfortunately, libtool is one of my black spots in my Linux knowlegde.
>
> Trying to emerge app-editors/kile-2.0.3-r1 libtool fails with
> libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/lib/libpcreposix.la'
>
> The libto
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 11:59 +0200, Philipp Riegger wrote:
> There was a bug about this (libpcre not installing the .la files).
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=266016 should be it btw..
Philipp
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 11:45 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> unfortunately, libtool is one of my black spots in my Linux knowlegde.
>
> Trying to emerge app-editors/kile-2.0.3-r1 libtool fails with
> libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/lib/libpcreposix.la'
>
> The libtool command is too
Hi,
unfortunately, libtool is one of my black spots in my Linux knowlegde.
Trying to emerge app-editors/kile-2.0.3-r1 libtool fails with
libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/lib/libpcreposix.la'
The libtool command is too long to include here, but it definitely
doesn't contain pcreposix
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:23:17 +0500, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
> And I hate to re-emerge same gcc every time some minor bug (which I
> didn't happen to reproduce) is fixed.
IKWYM but I think, on balance, this one would have benefited from a bump
as the effects of the breakage were quite widespread. It
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:03:00 +0100 (CET)
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> I do love this !!!
And I hate to re-emerge same gcc every time some minor bug (which I
didn't happen to reproduce) is fixed.
--
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 3 Feb, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Re-emerge gcc-4.3.3 - this was fixed without a revision bump.
^^^
I do love this !!!
Many thanks,
Helmut.
--
Helmut Jarausch
Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik
RWTH - Aachen University
D 52056 Aach
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:15:55 +0100 (CET), Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> since a short time many (not all) packages fail to build with a message
> like
> /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/libgomp.la
>
> The problem is that I have upgraded to gcc-4.3.3 so there is no path
> /usr/
Helmut Jarausch schrieb:
> On 3 Feb, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, 3. Februar 2009 13:15:55 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
>>
>>> since a short time many (not all) packages fail to build with a message
>>> like
>>> /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/libgomp.la
>>>
>>> The
On Dienstag 03 Februar 2009, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since a short time many (not all) packages fail to build with a message
> like
> /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/libgomp.la
>
> The problem is that I have upgraded to gcc-4.3.3 so there is no path
> /usr/lib/gcc
On 3 Feb, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 3. Februar 2009 13:15:55 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
>
>> since a short time many (not all) packages fail to build with a message
>> like
>> /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/libgomp.la
>>
>> The problem is that I have upgraded t
Am Dienstag, 3. Februar 2009 13:15:55 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
> since a short time many (not all) packages fail to build with a message
> like
> /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/libgomp.la
>
> The problem is that I have upgraded to gcc-4.3.3 so there is no path
> /usr/lib
Hi,
since a short time many (not all) packages fail to build with a message
like
/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/libgomp.la
The problem is that I have upgraded to gcc-4.3.3 so there is no path
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2
anymore.
I have rebuilt libtool, sourced
I understand this is just a warning but has Gentoo made itself somehow
not so friendly for us common folk who are not programmers? As
probably many know, I've been running Gentoo for 3-4 years. I've never
had problems like I've had recently with Gentoo. Excuse my frustration
but many things seem s
Great, it is merging again.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:02:00PM +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
> Yes, emerge dgs:
>
> dgs
> Description: fake ebuild to force removal of broken path_dps.m4
>
> Then try your emerge again.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
> I'm having trouble emerging programs like libmng and libtool.
>
> The problem looks like this:
> ==
>
> /usr/share/aclocal/path_dps.m4:172: file `path_dps.m4' does not exist
>
> !!! ERROR: sys-devel/libtool-1.5.20 failed.
> !!! Function s
I'm having trouble emerging programs like libmng and libtool.
The problem looks like this:
==
Running autotools in '.' ...
/usr/share/aclocal/wxwin.m4:36: warning: underquoted definition of
AM_OPTIONS_WXCONFIG
run info '(automake)Extending aclocal'
or see http://s
26 matches
Mail list logo
