On 2005-12-19 23:05:01 + (Mon, Dec), Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:17:46 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
> > >Because it is insecure on some mail readers and unreadable on others.
>
> > Linux insecure? Never had that problem before.
>
> Leaving aside the fact that many people are force
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:04:42 + Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:05:09 -0600, Dale wrote:
| > Then add in that most block emails that have HTML in it so they
| > will not see what you post anyway. I'm not sure why they block HTML
| > but I was told they do.
|
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 04:46, Holly Bostick wrote:
> How about this, then--> :-o ?
Yup, kmail knows that one too.
> Not to disrespect your mad cli skills, but that's a lot of additon
> there. Is the 'average' mutt user going to want to do all that? I am
> really asking, since I don't know an
On 12/19/05, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tell people not to do such things (just as it is important to instruct
> people not to put their cat/dog in the microwave to dry them off after a
> bath).
Come-on Holly, _everybody_ knows that you dry pets off by putting them
in the clothes d
Holly Bostick wrote:
So it is apparently important to
tell people not to do such things (just as it is important to instruct
people not to put their cat/dog in the microwave to dry them off after a
bath).
Holly
OK, she is smart and funny. Trying to picture what she would look
like. This
Ben schreef:
> On Monday 19 December 2005 22:58, Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>> That does not mean that the mail is showing up as HTML. That
>> conversion from a text smiley to a graphical smiley is a feature of
>> the Mozilla mail readers (MozMail and Thunderbird); it converts the
>> smileys it knows
Ben wrote:
On Monday 19 December 2005 22:58, Holly Bostick wrote:
That does not mean that the mail is showing up as HTML. That conversion
from a text smiley to a graphical smiley is a feature of the Mozilla
mail readers (MozMail and Thunderbird); it converts the smileys it knows
to graphics.
On Monday 19 December 2005 22:58, Holly Bostick wrote:
> That does not mean that the mail is showing up as HTML. That conversion
> from a text smiley to a graphical smiley is a feature of the Mozilla
> mail readers (MozMail and Thunderbird); it converts the smileys it knows
> to graphics. It doesn'
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:17:46 -0600, Dale wrote:
> >Because it is insecure on some mail readers and unreadable on others.
> Linux insecure? Never had that problem before.
Leaving aside the fact that many people are forced to use Outlook at
work, HTML can contain CGI scripts disguised as images,
jangar schreef:
> hi
>
Oh, I forgot to say hi to jangar :-o
(That's me, you'll get used to it, hopefully ;-) ).
Hi, jangar! Nice to meet you. Welcome in!
Holly
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Dale schreef:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>>
>> Because it is insecure on some mail readers and unreadable on
>> others.
>>
>>
> Linux insecure? Never had that problem before.
Everybody doesn't always read the list on Linux, or using Linux mail
readers.
Suppose you're reading it at work, where
Neil Bothwick wrote:
Because it is insecure on some mail readers and unreadable on others.
Linux insecure? Never had that problem before. Unreadable I may can
get though. I use Mozilla-mail so I am a new fuddy duddy. :-) I can
get HTML or text only just the same. Actually mine shows
Welcome to the list. You'll certainly find a wealth of knowledge here.
Dale wrote:
Few words of advice. Bottom post and email text only. Folks will
stomp on you until there is a mudhole then stomp it dry if you do
either of those. Then add in that most block emails that have HTML
in it so they will not see what you post anyway. I'm not sure why
they block HTML b
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:05:09 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Then add in that most block emails that have HTML in it so they
> will not see what you post anyway. I'm not sure why they block HTML
> but I was told they do.
Because it is insecure on some mail readers and unreadable on others.
--
Neil Both
> Few words of advice. Bottom post and email text only. Folks will stomp
> on you until there is a mudhole then stomp it dry if you do either of
> those. Then add in that most block emails that have HTML in it so they
> will not see what you post anyway. I'm not sure why they block HTML but
> I
Denis wrote:
Few words of advice. Bottom post and email text only.
but with sufficient clipping of the text that you're including in the reply :)
I always forget. :-(
Dale
:-)
--
To err is human, I'm most certainly human.
I have four rigs:
1: Home built; Abit NF7 ver 2.0 w/ AM
> Few words of advice. Bottom post and email text only.
but with sufficient clipping of the text that you're including in the reply :)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Andy Stern wrote:
| On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:19:59 +0100
| jangar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| hi
|
| --
| gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
|
hello *g*
Registered Linux User #404755 wit
Whaddup! Welcome to the list. :-)
jangar wrote:
> hi
>
--
Darth Vader:
Commander, tear this ship apart until you've
found those plans. And bring me the passengers, I
want them alive!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
| On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:19:59 +0100
| jangar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| hi
|
| --
| gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
|
hello *g*
Registered Linux
hi
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
22 matches
Mail list logo
