On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 06:10:48PM +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
> What exactly are you trying to acheive?
I want to run mutt without it using my installed postfix, but another
dedicated, external SMTP server instead. I use postfix on the box to
test things out (like dspam, RBLs, various policy server
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:21:17AM -0400, gentuxx wrote:
> I believe adding the "mailwrapper" USE flag will give you what you
> want. According to [1] this flag allows multiple MTAs.
>
> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/dyn/use-index.xml
Yeah this works. It has a side effect of clobbering the
/usr/sbi
I don't understand why you would need to do this? If you need a MTA and a
MUA, why would you bother with a MUA? All of what a MUA can do is in the
MTA - postfix
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Covington, Chris wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to have both nbsmtp and postfix, so that I can run an MTA and
u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Covington, Chris wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'd like to have both nbsmtp and postfix, so that I can run an MTA and
>use an MUA independently of each other. Although the two can co-exist
>peacefully, the combo seems to upset portage:
>
>videodrome ccovington #
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:02:20 -0400
"Covington, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to have both nbsmtp and postfix, so that I can run an MTA and
> use an MUA independently of each other. Although the two can co-exist
> peacefully, the combo seems to upset portage:
>
> video
Hi all,
I'd like to have both nbsmtp and postfix, so that I can run an MTA and
use an MUA independently of each other. Although the two can co-exist
peacefully, the combo seems to upset portage:
videodrome ccovington # emerge -pvDu world
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Cal
6 matches
Mail list logo
