Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.14.1 upgrade

2011-11-27 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 27.11.2011 01:59, schrieb Paul Hartman: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Adam Carter wrote: >>> /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by >>> /lib64/libcrypt.so.1) >>> >>> There were no @preserved-rebuild and revdep-rebuild found nothing. I >>> rebuilt

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.14.1 upgrade

2011-11-26 Thread Paul Hartman
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Adam Carter wrote: >> /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by >> /lib64/libcrypt.so.1) >> >> There were no @preserved-rebuild and revdep-rebuild found nothing. I >> rebuilt pam and things seem to be working again. Are

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.14.1 upgrade

2011-11-26 Thread Adam Carter
>>> >> /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by >>> >> /lib64/libcrypt.so.1) >>> >> >>> >> There were no @preserved-rebuild and revdep-rebuild found nothing. I >>> >> rebuilt pam and things seem to be working again. Are there any other >>> >> packages I should rebuild before en

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.14.1 upgrade

2011-11-26 Thread Paul Hartman
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Florian Philipp wrote: > Am 25.11.2011 19:11, schrieb Pandu Poluan: >> >> On Nov 26, 2011 12:05 AM, "微菜" > > wrote: >>> >>> 于 2011年11月24日 15:34, justin 写道: >>> > On 24/11/11 06:27, Paul Hartman wrote: >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> Aft

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.14.1 upgrade

2011-11-25 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
2011/11/25 Florian Philipp > Am 25.11.2011 19:11, schrieb Pandu Poluan: > > > > On Nov 26, 2011 12:05 AM, "微菜" > > wrote: > >> > >> 于 2011年11月24日 15:34, justin 写道: > >> > On 24/11/11 06:27, Paul Hartman wrote: > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> After emerging glibc-2.

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.14.1 upgrade

2011-11-25 Thread Michael Mol
106 minutes, 177 packsges on a fresh install (on a dual E5345 I just got my hands on). God help you if you if you have KDE installed, though. Even without it, my core desktop has somewhere between 500-700 packages. Builds overnight on my Phenom 9650. ZZ On Nov 25, 2011 2:04 PM, "Florian Philipp"

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.14.1 upgrade

2011-11-25 Thread Albert W. Hopkins
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 22:30 +, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 19:59:51 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote: > > > I've used Gentoo since 2006 and never had any reason to emerge -e. > > Apart from the occasional gcc ABI change, the only time I do it is after > a fresh install, so that eve

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.14.1 upgrade

2011-11-25 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 19:59:51 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote: > I've used Gentoo since 2006 and never had any reason to emerge -e. Apart from the occasional gcc ABI change, the only time I do it is after a fresh install, so that everything is built with the installed toolchain. -- Neil Bothwick

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.14.1 upgrade

2011-11-25 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 25.11.2011 19:11, schrieb Pandu Poluan: > > On Nov 26, 2011 12:05 AM, "微菜" > wrote: >> >> 于 2011年11月24日 15:34, justin 写道: >> > On 24/11/11 06:27, Paul Hartman wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> After emerging glibc-2.14.1 today, pam stopped working, which >> >> pre

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.14.1 upgrade

2011-11-25 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Nov 26, 2011 12:05 AM, "微菜" wrote: > > 于 2011年11月24日 15:34, justin 写道: > > On 24/11/11 06:27, Paul Hartman wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> After emerging glibc-2.14.1 today, pam stopped working, which > >> prevented KDE from working and some other things. I got this kind of > >> message: > >> > >> /l

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.14.1 upgrade

2011-11-25 Thread 微菜
于 2011年11月24日 15:34, justin 写道: > On 24/11/11 06:27, Paul Hartman wrote: >> Hi, >> >> After emerging glibc-2.14.1 today, pam stopped working, which >> prevented KDE from working and some other things. I got this kind of >> message: >> >> /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.14.1 upgrade

2011-11-24 Thread justin
On 24/11/11 06:27, Paul Hartman wrote: > Hi, > > After emerging glibc-2.14.1 today, pam stopped working, which > prevented KDE from working and some other things. I got this kind of > message: > > /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by > /lib64/libcrypt.so.1) > > There wer

[gentoo-user] glibc-2.14.1 upgrade

2011-11-23 Thread Paul Hartman
Hi, After emerging glibc-2.14.1 today, pam stopped working, which prevented KDE from working and some other things. I got this kind of message: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by /lib64/libcrypt.so.1) There were no @preserved-rebuild and revdep-rebuild found nothing. I