On Sunday 22 August 2010, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 20:57 on Sunday 22 August 2010,
> >
> > cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
> > > > There is a way to downgrade for the brave.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > quickpkg glibc
>
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:44 on Sunday 22 August 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 20:57 on Sunday 22 August 2010,
> >
> > cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
> > > > There is a way to downgrade for the brave.
>
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 20:57 on Sunday 22 August 2010,
> cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
>
> > > There is a way to downgrade for the brave.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > quickpkg glibc
> > > move the 2.11.? version ebuild you want to your local overlay.
> > >
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:57 on Sunday 22 August 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
> > There is a way to downgrade for the brave.
> >
> >
> >
> > quickpkg glibc
> > move the 2.11.? version ebuild you want to your local overlay.
> > Edit it and find the check that disallows d
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 15:29 on Sunday 22 August 2010, Arttu V. did
> opine thusly:
>
> > On 8/22/10, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > > Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged --
> > > amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:29 on Sunday 22 August 2010, Arttu V. did
opine thusly:
> On 8/22/10, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged --
> > amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2.12.1-r1, however
> > after doing t
Arttu V. wrote:
> On 8/22/10, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged --
> > amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2.12.1-r1, however
> > after doing this at least one package had an undefined reference to
> > S_ISCHR. I tri
On 8/22/10, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged --
> amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2.12.1-r1, however
> after doing this at least one package had an undefined reference to
> S_ISCHR. I tried to downgrade glibc, but a
cov...@ccs.covici.com writes:
> Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged --
> amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2.12.1-r1, however
> after doing this at least one package had an undefined reference to
> S_ISCHR. I tried to downgrade glibc, but apparently t
Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged --
amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2.12.1-r1, however
after doing this at least one package had an undefined reference to
S_ISCHR. I tried to downgrade glibc, but apparently this is not
supported and I am a bit stu
Apparently, though unproven, at 19:28 on Thursday 19 August 2010, Neil
Bothwick did opine thusly:
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:55:02 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Besides, if I don't give them some form of responsibility they will
> > never become responsible.
>
> Unfortunately, the converse is no
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:55:02 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Besides, if I don't give them some form of responsibility they will
> never become responsible.
Unfortunately, the converse is not necessarily true :(
--
Neil Bothwick
We have a equal opportunity Calculus class -- it's fully integrate
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:49 on Thursday 19 August 2010, Neil
Bothwick did opine thusly:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:05:05 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > But for critical production machines? Not a flying chance in hell :-)
> > Too many times I've had to sort out the carnage from idiotic j
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:05:05 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> But for critical production machines? Not a flying chance in hell :-)
> Too many times I've had to sort out the carnage from idiotic juniors
> who blindly run "emerge -uND world" and walk away thinking Unix always
> works like RedHat.
Why
On Wednesday 18 August 2010 01:32:32 William Kenworthy wrote:
> Hi Alan, a suggestion - for "mission critical" clone one of your systems
> into a vm (dd), get it working, upgrade and test.
>
> Or clone to a chroot and do the same.
>
> Not quite 100% - but allows some peace of mind!
Hi Bill,
G
Hi Alan, a suggestion - for "mission critical" clone one of your systems
into a vm (dd), get it working, upgrade and test.
Or clone to a chroot and do the same.
Not quite 100% - but allows some peace of mind!
BillK
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 17:34 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 August 2
Em 17-08-2010 12:34, Alan McKinnon escreveu:
> On Tuesday 17 August 2010 15:21:35 Peter Ruskin wrote:
>> On Tuesday 17 August 2010 09:33:09 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Anyone successfully built and using glibc-2.12.1 yet?
>>>
>>> I see the tree just pushed an update down from 2.11.2 to 2.
On Tuesday 17 August 2010 15:21:35 Peter Ruskin wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 August 2010 09:33:09 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Anyone successfully built and using glibc-2.12.1 yet?
> >
> > I see the tree just pushed an update down from 2.11.2 to 2.12.1,
> > and downgrading that package is decid
I have glibc-2.12.1 running on two ~x86 systems with no problems so far.
> Hi,
>
> Anyone successfully built and using glibc-2.12.1 yet?
>
> I see the tree just pushed an update down from 2.11.2 to 2.12.1, and
> downgrading that package is decidedly non-trivial. Only comment I can find at
> this
Hi,
Anyone successfully built and using glibc-2.12.1 yet?
I see the tree just pushed an update down from 2.11.2 to 2.12.1, and
downgrading that package is decidedly non-trivial. Only comment I can find at
this early stage is flameeye's blog, and this makes me quadruple nervous:
And if you s
20 matches
Mail list logo
