Re: [gentoo-user] fsck problems

2005-04-13 Thread Shawn Singh
My box complaining that a fs was not cleanly unmounted (I'm using ReiserFS if it makes any difference) and I didn't know why it was doing that...so I shutdown the computer using *shutdown -hF now* and when it came back up the messages were not there... Shawn On 4/8/05, A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [gentoo-user] fsck problems

2005-04-08 Thread A. Khattri
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Dave Weaver wrote: > I've tried booting of the Gentoo boot disk, but when I do that fsck > tells me there are no errors on that partition. > > Why the difference? > How do I fix the errors? > Why does fsck tell me that the drive wasn't cleanly unmounted? (I > always shutdown an

RE: [gentoo-user] fsck problems

2005-04-08 Thread Dave Nebinger
> If I run 'fsck -n /dev/hda3' I'm told that there are some errors: > > fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004) > e2fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004) > Warning! /dev/hda3 is mounted. > /dev/hda3 was not cleanly unmounted, check forced. > Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes > Inode 131170, i_blocks is

Re: [gentoo-user] fsck problems

2005-04-08 Thread Richard Fish
Dave Weaver wrote: >If I run 'fsck -n /dev/hda3' I'm told that there are some errors: > > fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004) > e2fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004) > Warning! /dev/hda3 is mounted. > /dev/hda3 was not cleanly unmounted, check forced. > > Running fsck on a filesystem mounted read/write is not a

[gentoo-user] fsck problems

2005-04-08 Thread Dave Weaver
If I run 'fsck -n /dev/hda3' I'm told that there are some errors: fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004) e2fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004) Warning! /dev/hda3 is mounted. /dev/hda3 was not cleanly unmounted, check forced. Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 131170, i_blocks is 64, should be 8.