On Friday 09 December 2005 15:48, a tiny voice compelled Ernie Schroder to
write:
> On Friday 09 December 2005 15:45, a tiny voice compelled Richard Fish to
>
> write:
> > On 12/9/05, Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > is NPTL a selectable kernel option? I can't seem to locate it.
> >
On Friday 09 December 2005 15:45, a tiny voice compelled Richard Fish to
write:
> On 12/9/05, Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > is NPTL a selectable kernel option? I can't seem to locate it.
>
> Nope, it is a core kernel function..not configurable.
>
> -Richard
Thanks
--
Regards, E
On 12/9/05, Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> is NPTL a selectable kernel option? I can't seem to locate it.
Nope, it is a core kernel function..not configurable.
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Friday 09 December 2005 14:56, a tiny voice compelled Richard Fish to
write:
> On 12/9/05, Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > looks like I have to build a new kernel
>
>
>
> > 09:37:26 up 1 day, 16:10, 3 users, load average: 0.18, 0.20, 0.44
> > Linux 2.6.5-gentoo-r1 i686 AMD
On 12/9/05, Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> looks like I have to build a new kernel
> 09:37:26 up 1 day, 16:10, 3 users, load average: 0.18, 0.20, 0.44
> Linux 2.6.5-gentoo-r1 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+
Yes, you haven't done that for at least a year!
-Richard
--
gentoo-u
On 12/8/05, Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it your opinion that this would help my situation with the multiple
> instances? If so I will give it a try tomorrow.
No idea, but it is worth a shot.
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday 08 December 2005 19:02, a tiny voice compelled Richard Fish to
write:
> On 12/8/05, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/8/05, Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thursday 08 December 2005 10:05, a tiny voice compelled Mark Knecht
> > > to
> > >
> > > write:
On 12/8/05, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/8/05, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/8/05, Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thursday 08 December 2005 10:05, a tiny voice compelled Mark Knecht to
> > > write:
> > > > The problem I see periodically is t
Is it your opinion that this would help my situation with the multiple
instances? If so I will give it a try tomorrow.
On Thursday 08 December 2005 19:02, a tiny voice compelled Richard Fish to
write:
> On 12/8/05, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/8/05, Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PRO
On 12/8/05, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/8/05, Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 08 December 2005 10:05, a tiny voice compelled Mark Knecht to
> > write:
> > > The problem I see periodically is that at time the java_vm will go to
> > > 100% CPU and I have t
On 12/8/05, Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Certain pages opened in Firefox start java_vm processes that will not allow
> mplayer to work until I do a killall java_vm. When I do that, any and all
> firefox windows will close as well. Closing all instances of firefox also
> kills all jav
On 12/8/05, Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 08 December 2005 10:05, a tiny voice compelled Mark Knecht to
> write:
> > The problem I see periodically is that at time the java_vm will go to
> > 100% CPU and I have to kill it by hand.
>
>
> But you only show one instance of ja
On Thursday 08 December 2005 10:05, a tiny voice compelled Mark Knecht to
write:
> The problem I see periodically is that at time the java_vm will go to
> 100% CPU and I have to kill it by hand.
After playing a couple hands of Omaha at pogo:
ps ax | grep java
30537 ?S 0:01 java_vm
On Thursday 08 December 2005 10:05, a tiny voice compelled Mark Knecht to
write:
> The problem I see periodically is that at time the java_vm will go to
> 100% CPU and I have to kill it by hand.
But you only show one instance of java_vm, right?
--
Regards, Ernie
100% Microsoft and Intel free
On 12/8/05, Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Certain pages opened in Firefox start java_vm processes that will not allow
> mplayer to work until I do a killall java_vm. When I do that, any and all
> firefox windows will close as well. Closing all instances of firefox also
> kills all jav
Ernie Schroder wrote:
>Certain pages opened in Firefox start java_vm processes that will not allow
>mplayer to work until I do a killall java_vm. When I do that, any and all
>firefox windows will close as well. Closing all instances of firefox also
>kills all java_vm processes. At times I might
Certain pages opened in Firefox start java_vm processes that will not allow
mplayer to work until I do a killall java_vm. When I do that, any and all
firefox windows will close as well. Closing all instances of firefox also
kills all java_vm processes. At times I might have 15 or 20 instances of
17 matches
Mail list logo
