On 13.12.2011 01:44, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On my system, /usr/portage currently contains 127000 files. But for reason of
> increased performance I put it into a squashfs file. (There was a nice howto
> on this ML some months ago). You could try that, which will free those inodes
> up and id
On 12/12/2011 06:15 AM, Daniel Troeder wrote:
$ fsck -vf /dev/sda5
[..]
655360 inodes used (100.00%)
[..]
$ find /gentoo -xdev | wc -l
655338
That's really disappointing. I was using reiser3fs and XFS before, and
they didn't have that kind of limitation... Uhm... not meant as a rant -
I lik
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:15:52PM +0100, Daniel Troeder wrote:
> I have an ext4-filesystem that contains /usr/src, the /usr/portage and
> /var/cache/edb. It previously also contained /var/db/pkg, but I had to
> move that some weeks ago, because the fs was "full". Now it's "full"
> again, though i
On 12.12.2011 15:54, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Joseph writes:
>> That is scary. I just install new HD with 2TB capacity and ext4 that is
>> 2% full and:
>> $ find /home/joseph/ -xdev | wc -l
>> shows: 169977 that is 26% full.
> No, that is 26% of the number of total inodes _Daniel_ has on his small
Joseph writes:
> On 12/12/11 12:15, Daniel Troeder wrote:
> >Hello :)
> >
> >I have an ext4-filesystem that contains /usr/src, the /usr/portage and
> >/var/cache/edb. It previously also contained /var/db/pkg, but I had to
> >move that some weeks ago, because the fs was "full". Now it's "full"
> >a
On Dec 12, 2011 9:39 PM, "Joseph" wrote:
>
> Quick googling around indicates that JFS, or XFS don't have these
limitation.
> -quote
> Many computer programs used by system administrators in UNIX operating
systems often designate files with inode numbers. Examples include popular
disk i
Quick googling around indicates that JFS, or XFS don't have these limitation.
-quote
Many computer programs used by system administrators in UNIX operating systems often designate files with inode numbers. Examples include popular disk
integrity checking utilities such as the fsck or
On 12/12/11 12:15, Daniel Troeder wrote:
Hello :)
I have an ext4-filesystem that contains /usr/src, the /usr/portage and
/var/cache/edb. It previously also contained /var/db/pkg, but I had to
move that some weeks ago, because the fs was "full". Now it's "full"
again, though it has free blocks. B
Daniel Troeder writes:
> I have an ext4-filesystem that contains /usr/src, the /usr/portage and
> /var/cache/edb. It previously also contained /var/db/pkg, but I had to
> move that some weeks ago, because the fs was "full". Now it's "full"
> again, though it has free blocks. But no inodes are left
Hello :)
I have an ext4-filesystem that contains /usr/src, the /usr/portage and
/var/cache/edb. It previously also contained /var/db/pkg, but I had to
move that some weeks ago, because the fs was "full". Now it's "full"
again, though it has free blocks. But no inodes are left:
$ fsck -vf /dev/sda
10 matches
Mail list logo
