Richard Fish said:
> Based on what the developers presented at the 2005 OLS, delayed
> allocation, and an extents-based format (ext4?) are coming:
>
> http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2005/linuxsymposium_procv1.pdf
That looks very intriguing. :-D
Thanks for your thorough explanations, Richard!
--Pet
Peter Gordon wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 20:34 -0800, Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote:
For a more sustainable situation, switch to XFS [It involved a
backup/format/restore by whatever means you want] In any case, xfs
has a tool called 'xfs_fsr' Which means 'file system reorganizer'.
It does def
Joshua Schmidlkofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For a more sustainable situation, switch to XFS [It involved a
> backup/format/restore by whatever means you want]
And if you do, make sure you have a good UPS.
--
Hilsen Harald.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Peter Gordon wrote:
>
>For what it's worth, I've never had a *single* problem with Ext3, and
>I've been using it with various distributions since I first started
>playing with GNU/Linux a few weeks after Fedora Core 1 was released.
>
>--Peter
>
>
I use reiserfs and have had no problems either.
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 20:34 -0800, Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote:
> For a more sustainable situation, switch to XFS [It involved a
> backup/format/restore by whatever means you want] In any case, xfs
> has a tool called 'xfs_fsr' Which means 'file system reorganizer'.
> It does defragmentation, and b
On 10/31/05, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rafael Fernández López wrote:>Hi,>>Well, I'd like to recover those holes (that 10% of the disk) and how to>do it, because I've tried with e2fsck with different options and read>"man e2fsck" with no possitive results.
>>Thanks,>Rafael Fernández López.>>>T
Rafael Fernández López wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Well, I'd like to recover those holes (that 10% of the disk) and how to
>do it, because I've tried with e2fsck with different options and read
>"man e2fsck" with no possitive results.
>
>Thanks,
>Rafael Fernández López.
>
>
>
There was a guru on the forums t
Rafael Fernández López wrote:
> ~ (more or less) the 10% of the filesystem is
> non-contiguous. I suppose that the problem is that I've saved and
> then deleted some files really big, and there's a hole.
>
> Well, I'd like to recover those holes (that 10% of the disk)
There are no holes, the
Hi,
Each 20 times that my hard disk is mounted, my ext3 partition (is the
only one that I have) gets checked for inconsistencies.
On the last times that that task has been runned, it tells me that ~
(more or less) the 10% of the filesystem is non-contiguous. I suppose
that the pro
9 matches
Mail list logo
