On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> On 17/09/14 16:16, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Samuli Suominen
>> wrote:
>>> On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> For some reason xfce-power-
On 17/09/14 16:16, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>> On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local
install needs but
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local
>>> install needs but 1.3.0 does. So portage wants to make it so.
>>>
On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local
>> install needs but 1.3.0 does. So portage wants to make it so.
>>
> Version 1.3.1 was removed from the tree, leaving only 1.3.0 to
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 09/16/2014 12:39 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>>
>> Replacing brightness with power in XFCE_PLUGINS, followed by running
>> 'emerge -avuND @world', still tried to downgrade the package in
>> question.
>>
>> I then ran 'emerge -avuND '>x
On 09/16/2014 12:39 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>
> Replacing brightness with power in XFCE_PLUGINS, followed by running
> 'emerge -avuND @world', still tried to downgrade the package in
> question.
>
> I then ran 'emerge -avuND '>xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-1.3.1'
> which suggested adding '=
On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local
> install needs but 1.3.0 does. So portage wants to make it so.
>
Version 1.3.1 was removed from the tree, leaving only 1.3.0 to satisfy
XFCE_PLUGINS=battery/brightness.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 16/09/2014 17:51, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>> Recently, I updated xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager to version 1.3.1,
>> which is unstable, in order to prevent lvm2 from being pulled in as a
>> dependency.
>>
>> grep xfce-extra/xfce4-power-m
On 16/09/2014 17:51, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> Recently, I updated xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager to version 1.3.1,
> which is unstable, in order to prevent lvm2 from being pulled in as a
> dependency.
>
> grep xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager /etc/portage/package.*
> /etc/portage/package.accept_ke
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 09/16/2014 11:51 AM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>> Recently, I updated xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager to version 1.3.1,
>> which is unstable, in order to prevent lvm2 from being pulled in as a
>> dependency.
>>
>> [ebuild UD ] xfce-ex
On 09/16/2014 11:51 AM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> Recently, I updated xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager to version 1.3.1,
> which is unstable, in order to prevent lvm2 from being pulled in as a
> dependency.
>
> [ebuild UD ] xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-1.3.0 [1.3.1]
> USE="policykit udisks%*
Recently, I updated xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager to version 1.3.1,
which is unstable, in order to prevent lvm2 from being pulled in as a
dependency.
grep xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager /etc/portage/package.*
/etc/portage/package.accept_keywords:=xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-1.3.1 ~x86
As I ra
12 matches
Mail list logo
