Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --update pulling in enlightenment-0.16.9999.050

2008-12-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Friday 05 December 2008 05:46:30 Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote: > > I should give e17 another try when it gets a little more stable, or > > when at least Vapier finds the time to update the snapshot ebuilds > > (which, last time I checked, were horribly outdated). > > > > Regards, > >Jo

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --update pulling in enlightenment-0.16.9999.050

2008-12-04 Thread Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto
> I should give e17 another try when it gets a little more stable, or > when at least Vapier finds the time to update the snapshot ebuilds > (which, last time I checked, were horribly outdated). > > Regards, >Jorge Peixoto Oh, great, it seems vapier updated the snapshots! Alan, would you recom

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --update pulling in enlightenment-0.16.9999.050

2008-12-04 Thread Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto
> e17 doesn't like transparency and compiz-style effects. You can get it to work > with the bling module or by using a compositing manager like xcompmgr or a > derivative, but I found it wasn't exactly stable on nVidia. You may have > better luck with ATI. Going offtopic, I for myself don't care a

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --update pulling in enlightenment-0.16.9999.050

2008-12-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thursday 04 December 2008 16:50:20 Willie Wong wrote: > > It's a convention. No sane coder will ever release a package with version > > , that is conventionally used by devs for their development stuff in > > cvs/svn/git/whatever, so vapier is just falling in line. > > Not exactly what I mea

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --update pulling in enlightenment-0.16.9999.050

2008-12-04 Thread Willie Wong
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 09:08:53AM +0200, Penguin Lover Alan McKinnon squawked: > The answer is not in the ebuild, it's in the eclass. You will find it at > $PORTDIR/ecalss/enlightenment.eclass. I'll take you through the relevant bits > step by step. Lines 34 to 58 are the relevant ones, and ever

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --update pulling in enlightenment-0.16.9999.050

2008-12-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thursday 04 December 2008 02:42:34 Willie Wong wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:58:28AM +0530, Penguin Lover Rajat Vig squawked: > > The Builds are Live CVS Builds. > > The default is to use the Snapshot builds which are getting pulled in. > > > > -Rajat > > Okay, a better question then

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --update pulling in enlightenment-0.16.9999.050

2008-12-03 Thread Willie Wong
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:58:28AM +0530, Penguin Lover Rajat Vig squawked: > The Builds are Live CVS Builds. > The default is to use the Snapshot builds which are getting pulled in. > > -Rajat > Okay, a better question then is: how does > > case ${EKEY_STATE:-${E_STATE}} in > >rel

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --update pulling in enlightenment-0.16.9999.050

2008-12-03 Thread Rajat Vig
The Builds are Live CVS Builds. The default is to use the Snapshot builds which are getting pulled in. -Rajat On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Willie Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:37:45AM -0500, Penguin Lover Willie Wong > squawked: > > emerge --update --deep

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --update pulling in enlightenment-0.16.9999.050

2008-12-03 Thread Willie Wong
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:37:45AM -0500, Penguin Lover Willie Wong squawked: > emerge --update --deep --pretend world is pulling in > x11-wm/enlightenment-0.16.999.050 > > I currently have > x11-wm/enlightenment-0.16.8.14 > installed, and was given to understand that the *.999 branch is the

[gentoo-user] emerge --update pulling in enlightenment-0.16.9999.050

2008-12-03 Thread Willie Wong
emerge --update --deep --pretend world is pulling in x11-wm/enlightenment-0.16.999.050 I currently have x11-wm/enlightenment-0.16.8.14 installed, and was given to understand that the *.999 branch is the devel branch. Looking at the ebuilds show that 0.16.8.14 has KEYWORDS="alpha amd64 arm