On 11/25/05, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The idea of having the temporary setting invisibly add a permanent
> setting seems cool, but undermines both the function of the temporary
> setting (since it's no longer truly temporary), and the function of the
> permanent setting (since you
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 06:16:40 -0800, glen martin wrote:
> As an aside, I wonder whether it is a good feature idea that
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="" emerge
> without --oneshot should automatically add to the
> package.keywords file.
It's a bad idea. Specifying a setting on the command line is temporar
glen martin schreef:
> Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>> glen martin schreef:
>>
>>> As an aside, I wonder whether it is a good feature idea that
>>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="" emerge without --oneshot should
>>> automatically add to the package.keywords file.
>>
>> That's an idea with some merit, but imo
Holly Bostick wrote:
>glen martin schreef:
>
>
>>As an aside, I wonder whether it is a good feature idea that
>>ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="" emerge without --oneshot should
>>automatically add to the package.keywords file.
>>
>>
>That's an idea with some merit, but imo not enough (merit) to make i
glen martin schreef:
>
> As an aside, I wonder whether it is a good feature idea that
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="" emerge without --oneshot should
> automatically add to the package.keywords file.
>
That's an idea with some merit, but imo not enough (merit) to make it
feasible (but it's not my decis
Willie Wong wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:01:43AM -0800, glen martin wrote:
>
>
>>Seems a truism, but you're right. apache isn't in my world file.
>>somehow. And adding it to my world file does work around the symptom I
>>describe.
>>
>>This begs the question of why it isn't there, conside
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:01:43 -0800, glen martin wrote:
> This begs the question of why it isn't there, considering it is
> installed. I must wonder, what else that I've installed has somehow not
> been added to the world file. Perhaps I'm exposing my ignorance, but is
> the world file not suppose
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:01:43AM -0800, glen martin wrote:
> Seems a truism, but you're right. apache isn't in my world file.
> somehow. And adding it to my world file does work around the symptom I
> describe.
>
> This begs the question of why it isn't there, considering it is
> installed. I m
Holly Bostick wrote:
>>So, any thoughts on why "emerge --newuse" doesn't want to rebuild
>>apache?
>>
>>
>
>Well, assuming it's not a bug (what version of Portage are you using?)
>then is it possible that apache is neither in your world file,
>
>
I'm on portage 2.0.51.22-r3. This is a ver
glen martin wrote:
note the lack of apache. Now:
# emerge --pretend --verbose apache
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild R ] net-www/apache-2.0.55 +apache2 -debug -doc +ldap
-mpm-leader -mpm-peruser -mpm-prefork -mpm-threadpool
On Thursday 24 November 2005 15:52, glen martin wrote:
> I've googled and scanned recent messages archive of this list for this
> issue - if I'm blind, apologies in advance.
>
> I've changed some USE flags deliberately to add features to a package
> (in this case, apache). That package is also imp
glen martin schreef:
>
> I've changed some USE flags deliberately to add features to a package
>
>
> Despite the USE change, I find that that apache is not being caught
> by "emerge --newuse world".
>
> I added "threads nptlonly mpm-worker" to USE in make.conf. I've
> probably made some ot
I've googled and scanned recent messages archive of this list for this
issue - if I'm blind, apologies in advance.
I've changed some USE flags deliberately to add features to a package
(in this case, apache). That package is also impacted by different
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS flag ("~86"), which I've spec
13 matches
Mail list logo
