Apparently, though unproven, at 21:01 on Wednesday 25 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
> On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:51:25 Mick wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:31:54 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did
> > > opine
> > >
> > > t
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:51:25 Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:31:54 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did
> > opine
> >
> > thusly:
> > > Anyway, tonight it failed right on the first package:
> > >
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:31:54 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did
> opine
>
> thusly:
> > Anyway, tonight it failed right on the first package:
> >
> >
> > >>> Emerging (1 of 10) dev-libs/eina-
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
> Anyway, tonight it failed right on the first package:
>
>
> >>> Emerging (1 of 10) dev-libs/eina- from enlightenment
[snip]
> ../../src/include/eina_binbuf.h:209: n
Apparently, though unproven, at 08:43 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
> > Very last comment here:
> > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/ticket/759
> > (ignore raster's anti-gentoo packager rants)
> >
> >
> >
> > Per your initial post, you have:
> >
> >
> > [ebuild R ] dev-lib
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 23:46:17 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 00:22 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did
> opine
>
> thusly:
> > On Tuesday 17 May 2011 21:32:06 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did
> > >
> > > opi
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:22 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
> On Tuesday 17 May 2011 21:32:06 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did
> >
> > opine thusly:
> > > On 17 May 2011 08:01, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > I c
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 21:32:06 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did
> opine thusly:
> > On 17 May 2011 08:01, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I compared by USE to yours and they are much the same apart from ofono (not
> relevant) and I have ukit en
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
> On 17 May 2011 08:01, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 08:23 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did
> > opine
> >
> > thusly:
> >> eukit >= 1.0.999
> >> ehal
> >> ) were not met:
> >>
>
On 17 May 2011 08:01, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 08:23 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine
> thusly:
>> eukit >= 1.0.999
>> ehal
>> ) were not met:
>>
>> No package 'ehal' found
>
> e17 from svn works fine here.
>
> What version are you trying to install?
These
Apparently, though unproven, at 08:23 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
> I had no problem building it on another gentoo box, but this one is
> giving me a headache.
>
> All packages build fine until the last package enlightenment and then
> it fails complaining about ... hal!
> [s
I had no problem building it on another gentoo box, but this one is
giving me a headache.
All packages build fine until the last package enlightenment and then
it fails complaining about ... hal!
# emerge -1aDv x11-wm/enlightenment
These are
12 matches
Mail list logo
