On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:57 PM, wrote:
> On 09/12 04:52, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> > I masked =sys-libs/glibc-2.25-r4.
>> >
>> > And now I remember why I did this: It gave a compilation error:
>> > (As some other packages) it has problems with my texinfo installation
>> > as it seems.
>> >
>
On 09/12 04:52, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > I masked =sys-libs/glibc-2.25-r4.
> >
> > And now I remember why I did this: It gave a compilation error:
> > (As some other packages) it has problems with my texinfo installation
> > as it seems.
> >
>
> bug number?
>
>
> --
> Andreas K. Hüttel
>
On 09/12 04:50, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017, 05:43:59 CEST schrieb tu...@posteo.de:
> > Hi,
> >
> > got a problem this morning:
> > >>> Verifying ebuild manifests
> > >>> Running pre-merge checks for sys-libs/glibc-2.24-r4
> >
> > * Sanity check to keep you from b
> I masked =sys-libs/glibc-2.25-r4.
>
> And now I remember why I did this: It gave a compilation error:
> (As some other packages) it has problems with my texinfo installation
> as it seems.
>
bug number?
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfri...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreof
Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017, 05:43:59 CEST schrieb tu...@posteo.de:
> Hi,
>
> got a problem this morning:
> >>> Verifying ebuild manifests
> >>> Running pre-merge checks for sys-libs/glibc-2.24-r4
>
> * Sanity check to keep you from breaking your system:
> * Downgrading glibc is not suppor
Hi,
WRONG! :) :) :)
I did something different, but it was the same amount of "wrong".
I masked =sys-libs/glibc-2.25-r4.
And now I remember why I did this: It gave a compilation error:
(As some other packages) it has problems with my texinfo installation
as it seems.
As suggested I run perl-cle
My guess: You have glibc-2.24-r4 and one of the 2.25 with revision <-r4
listed WITH EXACT VERSION AND REVISiON in your package.accept_keywords. The
recent glibc-cleanp remove those 2.25 revisions and only left 2.25-r4 and
2.24-r4 Leaving you with the downgrade as only option to get the most
recent
On 12/09/2017 05:43, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> got a problem this morning:
>
Verifying ebuild manifests
Running pre-merge checks for sys-libs/glibc-2.24-r4
> * Sanity check to keep you from breaking your system:
> * Downgrading glibc is not supported and a sure way to destruct
tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> got a problem this morning:
>
Verifying ebuild manifests
Running pre-merge checks for sys-libs/glibc-2.24-r4
> * Sanity check to keep you from breaking your system:
> * Downgrading glibc is not supported and a sure way to destruction
> * ERROR: sys-lib
Hi,
got a problem this morning:
>>> Verifying ebuild manifests
>>> Running pre-merge checks for sys-libs/glibc-2.24-r4
* Sanity check to keep you from breaking your system:
* Downgrading glibc is not supported and a sure way to destruction
* ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.24-r4::gentoo failed (prete
On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 16:25 +0200, Nils Freydank wrote:
> Hi Raffaele,
>
> Am Freitag, 18. August 2017, 09:00:52 CEST schrieb Raffaele Belardi:
> > […]
> > Downgrading the system to glibc to 2.23-r3 means trouble?
>
> yes, you would crush your system. Therefore the even the ebuild
> prohibits it
Hi Raffaele,
Am Freitag, 18. August 2017, 09:00:52 CEST schrieb Raffaele Belardi:
> […]
> Downgrading the system to glibc to 2.23-r3 means trouble?
yes, you would crush your system. Therefore the even the ebuild prohibits it
(you can enforce it, but you really shouldn’t).
You can a) brick you sy
I hava a build problem upgrading Mythtv to 0.28.1-r1 [1] on an ~amd64
system. The problem is related to a glibc API change [2] introduced in
glibc-2.24 and still present in glibc-2.25. So I'm thinking to try the
build with an older glibc version.
Downgrading the system to glibc to 2.23-r3 means tr
I went through the gcc upgrade and discovered that ssp no longer works
(suppose it was documented somewhere - but I missed it)
So I'm trying to reverse the upgrade process (this time using using a
hardened profile) and glibc won't allow me to downgrade.
How do I get around this, please?
I'
14 matches
Mail list logo
